.
Feedback

Words, Image and History Erupt in Ferlinghetti Show at SVMA

Wednesday is free admission to the Sonoma Valley Museum of Art, where Lawrence Ferlinghetti showed up for the opening of his newest show on Friday.

 

There was a lot to do in Sonoma on a Friday night. There was a hula demonstration in the plaza amphitheater. Sebastiani had a barbecue to celebrate the release of their 2010 Malbec. There was "pesticide free" music at Murphys. But the real action was at the, where Beat Royalty held court.

Lawrence Ferlinghetti - writer of "A Coney Island of the Mind," publisher of City Lights Books including Allen Ginsberg's "Howl", and for the last 50 years a painter of idiosyncratic and compelling whimsy - was present at the opening of the newest exhibit at the SVMA, "Cross-Pollination: The Art of Lawrence Ferlinghetti."  The show runs through September 23; admission on Wednesdays is free.

The poet, publisher and artist - Renaissance man would not be too strong a term - sat in a dim spot at the far room of the gallery, surrounded well-wishers, art lovers, literary colleagues and fans who just wanted to shake the hand of a man who made cultural history. If his name is not a household word, perhaps you grew up in the wrong house: it was in mine, and in that of many of the patrons of the arts who were in attendance Friday night.

His works from large brightly decorated canvases to small studies to painted artifacts burst with a vital cross-pollination -- hence the show's title -- of word and image, similar to the expressions of other Beat era artists such as "the Kenneths," Rexroth and Patchen. Lines of poetry, eruptions of ideas, truncated logic and lengthy exposition scrawled their way across portraits and surreal landscapes. This is not technical painting, but it is inspired.

It's how Ferlinghetti has always lived his life, and at 93, he's pretty good at it. Ferlinghetti was a painter first, poet second, pursuing his craft at the Sorbonne in Paris shortly after his naval service in World War II.  But it was his 1955 book A Coney Island of the Mind (published in 1958 by New Directions) that first brought him fame. The collection of poems has been translated into nine languages, with sales of over 1 million copies.

As illustrious as his poetry career has been, it's been running in parallel with his work as a painter - or, perhaps more accurately, visual artist.  His passion for image-making in paintings, drawings, prints, and mixed media that have been widely exhibited, including a major survey exhibition in 2010 in Rome and Calabria. To find them here, in Sonoma, is a coup for the Sonoma Valley Museum of Art for which executive director Kate Eilertsen is justifiably proud. 

Working with Ferlinghetti's curator, Diane Roby, a world-class exhibit has been assembled from the artist's Hunter's Point studio, including some works never before shown. These include a wooden book, a globe painted with the words "The Sun is God", and an ordinary kitchen clock transformed by the poet's restless imagination.

If cross-pollination between word and image is the over-riding theme of the show, it might be argued it's a theme of Ferlinghetti's own life. One of the large canvases in "Cross-Pollination" is a gray and black picture of anguish, with appropriately evocative lines from "Howl." There are works large and small referring to T.S. Eliot, Ezra Pound, James Joyce and others. His fellow artists, too, are given their props in works for Pablo Picasso and Vincent Van Gogh. And a randy Freud dances across the back wall.

Nonetheless, it's his career as a publisher that might be his most noteworthy contribution to culture. He co-founded City Lights Bookstore in San Francisco in 1952, at Columbus and Broadway in San Francisco. It was the first all-paperback bookstore in the country, and as such became a nexus for the democratization of literature at the birth of the Beat Generation.

Ferlinghetti started publishing in 1955, with his own book of poetry Pictures of the Gone World as the first title. The fourth was Howl and Other Poems, by Allen Ginsberg, the first time the already controversial poem had seen print. Upon its release in 1957, Ferlinghetti and the bookstore's manager were charged with disseminating obscene literature and arrested. They won the case, and it's safe to say literature - and movies, television, radio, Super Bowl halftime shows and just about every other form of popular arts - have never been the same since.

City Lights Books also published Kenneth Rexroth, Kenneth Patchen, Denise Levertov, Robert Duncan, Gregory Corso and William Carlos Williams among others, and Ferlinghetti became a kind of unofficial mentor for Beat poets. There were several current San Francisco poets among the guests at the show's opening on Friday night - and doubtless many poets yet to be published, and artists yet to be shown.

But it's that kind of show: there's some kind of a lightning-rod inside Lawrence Ferlinghetti, drawing fellow creative spirits toward him, and disseminating their energy into the center of the earth.

Cross-Pollination: The Art of Lawrence Ferlinghetti will be on view at the Sonoma Valley Museum of Art, 551 Broadway in Sonoma, June 23 through September 23, 2012.  The Museum hours are Wednesdays through Sundays 11 am– 5 pm.

Museum admission is $5 general, free for students in grades K-12.  Admission is free for all visitors every Wednesday.  More information about the Sonoma Valley Museum of Art is available online or by calling (707) 939-7862.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Sonoma Valley Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Ralph Hutchinson May 18, 2013 at 08:51 pm
I still say the People will be wise to these bush league tactics and the residents of Sonoma willRead More vote against the destruction of the Plaza and our small town feel. We won''t sell out like Napa or Healdsburg and certainly we're not like the 101 corridor.
Ralph Hutchinson May 17, 2013 at 09:38 am
Another Cuban party perhaps in the works at the Kenwood Ranch, chompin on contraband cigars, etc?Read More Grand prize trips to Cuba with Californians Building Bridges and rub elbows with fatcat Politicians? Or maybe Kings tickets?
Ralph Hutchinson May 17, 2013 at 11:37 am
What kind of conflicts of interest are present with Nancy Simpson? She is on the County Landmarks,Read More formerly affiliated with Sonoma Valley Visitors Bureau and Wendy Peterson? Are all these agencies and bureaus interlocked some receiving TOT tax revenues, and all standing to benefit from anything Darius Anderson can build?
Ralph Hutchinson May 17, 2013 at 11:32 am
Is Darius really after a casino in Sonoma either at General Vallejo State Park next to his RamekinsRead More location or up valley at Sonoma Development Center?
Ralph Hutchinson May 17, 2013 at 11:31 am
Ms. G doesn't even live in Sonoma does she? Isn't it Cloverdale? Wasn't she a big proponent of theRead More bypass in her town?
sal nero May 15, 2013 at 08:11 pm
The Sonoma Sun's website (but not SunFMTV) has been down for hours. What's happening ?
Ralph Hutchinson May 15, 2013 at 03:25 pm
Did Darius Anderso agree to buyout The Patch and have the archives and comments removed as part ofRead More this new software update? Afterall "Cows Not Casinos", Measure A Rosewood Hillside hotel, and Measure C Hospital Eminent Domain would be better if the People of Sonoma forgot all about it and let his hotel venture fly easier.
sal nero May 15, 2013 at 03:20 pm
When Bolling "lost" his comments on Sonoma Valley Bank and then the whole archive heRead More blamed a glitch yet they have never been restored. That has benefitted the Hotel Index-Tribune and allowed a cover up of key historical dates and facts. Please hurry and restore the Patch's missing blogs and comments ASAP so that the confidence the Sonoma Patch has attained is not damaged. Thanks
Ralph Hutchinson May 15, 2013 at 03:09 pm
The comments to various articles and blogs are also completely missing. Please restore asap.
Dee Baucher May 18, 2013 at 09:37 am
I write about the issue of the BRACA test, because I am someone who developed breast cancer, and whoRead More needed the test. Even though I already had breast cancer, the decision of whether to have a bilateral mastectomy (rather than just a removal of the cancer with a "lumpectomy" or the removal of only one, effected, breast) was dependent upon the results of that test. If I had a genetic marker that indicated I was likely to develop more breast cancers, there would be no reason to avoid having both breasts removed at once. Even though my doctors recognized the importance of getting this test done before surgical decisions were made, the insurance company was resistant to providing coverage for the test. There were many heated phone conversations with the insurance company, and many letters of documentation before I was finally allowed to have the test. The basic test for BRAC I and BRAC II (the 2 main genes identified) cost $3,000. However, there are even more specialized tests for the smaller BRAC genes (rare genes that are less common) that cost thousands of dollars extra, and would have been helpful because of my family history. I was not able to fight with the insurance company for permission to obtain those extra tests, since I was already weak and ill from the chemotherapy, at that time. It is not reasonable or acceptable for women to have to fight to get necessary tests performed, because of excessive charging for those tests, and resistance of the medical insurance companies to provide coverage to obtain them. This situation needs to be changed. I hope that Angelina Jolie's story will bring attention to this issue, and will help our Supreme Court to recognize the unfairness in allowing a company to lay claim on a "patent" of our genes. The main research to provide the exact mapping of our genes was provided by the "Human Genome Project", which was primarily paid for by the US taxpayers, via that extensive NIH study. The Myriad company did some further research to refine knowledge on the BRACA genes; but they should not be allowed a total patent which blocks all other US labs from performing tests on that same part of our DNA. That is unreasonable in terms of the amount of profit they are claiming, and unfair to US humans who should be able to claim ownership of their own DNA.
Dee Baucher May 18, 2013 at 08:50 am
I am not used to Hollywood-types having the type of integrity and honesty, that Ms. Jolie displayedRead More with her NY Times revelation. I commend her for having the courage to act proactively with surgical removal of her breasts, in addition to the planned removal of her ovaries. She lost her beloved mother to the disease, and she clearly understands the devastation that would befall her own children (if she were to develop the types of cancers that her genetic makeup render her vulnerable to). I agree with her decision, and hope that I would have the same strength, if confronted with the genetic evidence that she was able to have documented with the BRACA testing. Unfortunately, many women who would benefit in the same way, from advance knowledge about their genetic vulnerability to those cancers, are denied the ability to get the tests. The company that "owns" the test, by virtue of their assertion that they "own the patent" on that identified portion of our DNA, charge $3,000.00 for the test. That cost is too high for most women in the US to easily afford, and our health insurance typically refuses to cover the test for most women. There is currently a case before the US Supreme Court challenging the idea of a medical company owning our genes. Many of us are hopeful that the court will halt this company from claiming this patent, so that laboratories all over the country can provide the test to us inexpensively, and therefore it will be available to all who should have it. The costs for the type of very sophisticated plastic surgery/ breast reconstruction that Ms. Jolie underwent, are also extremely high. It is doubtful that insurance or Obamacare will provide coverage for that type of costly prophylactic surgery. Those are battles that women will need to fight in the future, when more women become informed about their personal risks and choices.