.
Feedback

'The Life of Pi' in 3D XD at Napa's New Theater Complex

Suspend questions about truth and reality, and get comfortable with an exquisite drifting into the metaphysical and metaphorical.

Truth.

Credibility.

Reality.

Non-fiction? Or just a tale?

Set it all aside, settle into your seat, with your 3D glasses and get ready to be swept away into an exotic, colorful adventure of the mind, body and spirit, as parakeets fly around you in the theater (well, not really) at the new Century Napa Valley Cinemark.

Introducing "The Life of Pi" in XD format with Dolby surround sound.

Wow.

"Is it a true story?"

Who cares? That's not the point.

What is the point?

The point is for you to decide the meaning of the story yourself at the end. I can tell you what I think. Warning: Don't read any further if that will spoil it for you.

First, bear with me through a summary and some of the best lines in this story, which is touted as being able to "make you believe in God."

A teenage boy's family in India encounters tough economic times and is forced to leave the country. The family owns a zoo. In order to start again in Canada, they board a freight ship, with their animals, for a long journey. For unknown reasons, the freighter sinks—but guess what? By some stroke of (choose your own interpretation: good fortune, karma, luck, God—whichever one you believe in) Pi is the only human survivor. Now add this: at the last minute, a zebra, an orangutan, a hyena and, ahem, a Bengal tiger (named Richard Parker) jump into the life raft with him. I kid you not.

The lead character, Pi, is played by Suaraj Sharma who is beautiful to watch. This movie is a sensory delight, with India's love of flowers and dance, the sounds of sitar wafting through and candles floating on the water.

There are scenes in which an orange and blue sky with white clouds is reflected so perfectly in the calm ocean that the viewer doesn't know if Pi's raft is in the sky or on the water—a perfect visual metaphor for the way life can appear as one thing but actually be another, and how we float, at times, in a tender delicate balance of "reality" ... a place between places. These scenes are sweet, silent and meditative—a welcome respite from the carnivorous drama.

Pi survives 227 days at sea. One by one, each animal is eaten. Pi becomes the remaining prey for Richard Parker, and so Pi must learn to "train" him.

During the movie, I was reminded of the saying, "Whatever doesn't kill you, makes you stronger."

As a strange coincidence this week, someone asked me a riddle: "Who would you rather live with: a foolish friend or a wise enemy?"

I said "a wise enemy, because at least I could figure him out and learn from him. Wisdom is always useful."

And so it is for Pi, living with his wise enemy. Enemies do what they feel they need to do. This is the tiger's nature.

Day after day on the wide ocean, Pi pulls out all stops in a battle of wits with the creature that seeks to kill him. After many days, the tiger lies with his head in Pi's lap nearly dying from hunger, as Pi strokes him.

In the end, they survive, and Richard Parker walks into the jungle without looking back. It breaks Pi's heart, because he had come to know him as his friend.

My favorite lines:

Ravenous Pi manages to catch a big, slippery, iridescent green fish. He hauls it onto his raft and repeatedly beats it in the head with an ax, until its life departs from its beautiful body. Then he weeps with guilt and cries out, "Thank you Vishnu for coming in the form of a fish and saving our lives!"

When the much older Pi is having lunch with a reporter, telling him his story, he pauses and bows his head. When the reporter comments on his mix of Hindu and Catholic religions, Pi says, "I have 300 gods to feel guilty about."

*******

Ok, now the point, as I see it.

When the investigators from the freighter company come to the hospital to get Pi's story about the ship sinking and his survival, Pi tells the story of Richard Parker and the rest of the menagerie. The men don't believe him. They say, "Tell us the truth."

"Oh," Pi says, "You mean you want a story that has no surprises in it, nothing that you haven't seen before?"

"Yes," they say.

"Ok," says Pi, and tearfully rattles off a completely different story about himself onboard a life raft with a cast of characters including the boorish, sweaty cook and Pi's mother. One by one they die, just like the original story. He is totally believable telling each story. There is even some kind of document that might possibly lend credence to the first one. But the men believe only the second story.

Many years later, when Pi tells the reporter this at lunch, the man asks, "Ah, so you are the real Richard Parker and your mother is ..."

Pi says yes.

"But which story is true?"

"Which story do you like?" asks Pi.

"I think I like the one with the Bengal tiger," the reporter says.

"And so it is with God," replies Pi.

*****

My take-away?

We can take the movie at face value as an adventure, but for those who prefer to look at the spiritual: "God" (replace with "truth" or "wisdom" if you will) can come to us in any form in which we can accept the "lesson" (read "message," "wisdom," "story," "person," "spirit," "religion"—whatever you want to call it.)

I once interviewed a minister who considered the Bible metaphorical rather than infallible, and he said most people don't understand that. I asked him, "What is the point of conveying a message in metaphor and parables?"

He answered, "Why do we read poetry? It tells a truth that can’t be told by any other means. There's certain ancient wisdom that can only be told in story format."

Pi gained wisdom from various belief systems and saw the "God" in a fish.

If you go, allow the movie to linger with you the rest of the day.

This is an exquisite work on so many levels.

Award winning book by Yann Martel. Movie direction by Ang Lee.

TELL US: Have you seen the movie? Will you go see it? How does it compare with the book? What point did you take away? Tell us in the comments.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Sonoma Valley Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Ralph Hutchinson May 18, 2013 at 08:51 pm
I still say the People will be wise to these bush league tactics and the residents of Sonoma willRead More vote against the destruction of the Plaza and our small town feel. We won''t sell out like Napa or Healdsburg and certainly we're not like the 101 corridor.
Ralph Hutchinson May 17, 2013 at 09:38 am
Another Cuban party perhaps in the works at the Kenwood Ranch, chompin on contraband cigars, etc?Read More Grand prize trips to Cuba with Californians Building Bridges and rub elbows with fatcat Politicians? Or maybe Kings tickets?
Ralph Hutchinson May 17, 2013 at 11:37 am
What kind of conflicts of interest are present with Nancy Simpson? She is on the County Landmarks,Read More formerly affiliated with Sonoma Valley Visitors Bureau and Wendy Peterson? Are all these agencies and bureaus interlocked some receiving TOT tax revenues, and all standing to benefit from anything Darius Anderson can build?
Ralph Hutchinson May 17, 2013 at 11:32 am
Is Darius really after a casino in Sonoma either at General Vallejo State Park next to his RamekinsRead More location or up valley at Sonoma Development Center?
Ralph Hutchinson May 17, 2013 at 11:31 am
Ms. G doesn't even live in Sonoma does she? Isn't it Cloverdale? Wasn't she a big proponent of theRead More bypass in her town?
sal nero May 15, 2013 at 08:11 pm
The Sonoma Sun's website (but not SunFMTV) has been down for hours. What's happening ?
Ralph Hutchinson May 15, 2013 at 03:25 pm
Did Darius Anderso agree to buyout The Patch and have the archives and comments removed as part ofRead More this new software update? Afterall "Cows Not Casinos", Measure A Rosewood Hillside hotel, and Measure C Hospital Eminent Domain would be better if the People of Sonoma forgot all about it and let his hotel venture fly easier.
sal nero May 15, 2013 at 03:20 pm
When Bolling "lost" his comments on Sonoma Valley Bank and then the whole archive heRead More blamed a glitch yet they have never been restored. That has benefitted the Hotel Index-Tribune and allowed a cover up of key historical dates and facts. Please hurry and restore the Patch's missing blogs and comments ASAP so that the confidence the Sonoma Patch has attained is not damaged. Thanks
Ralph Hutchinson May 15, 2013 at 03:09 pm
The comments to various articles and blogs are also completely missing. Please restore asap.
Dee Baucher May 18, 2013 at 09:37 am
I write about the issue of the BRACA test, because I am someone who developed breast cancer, and whoRead More needed the test. Even though I already had breast cancer, the decision of whether to have a bilateral mastectomy (rather than just a removal of the cancer with a "lumpectomy" or the removal of only one, effected, breast) was dependent upon the results of that test. If I had a genetic marker that indicated I was likely to develop more breast cancers, there would be no reason to avoid having both breasts removed at once. Even though my doctors recognized the importance of getting this test done before surgical decisions were made, the insurance company was resistant to providing coverage for the test. There were many heated phone conversations with the insurance company, and many letters of documentation before I was finally allowed to have the test. The basic test for BRAC I and BRAC II (the 2 main genes identified) cost $3,000. However, there are even more specialized tests for the smaller BRAC genes (rare genes that are less common) that cost thousands of dollars extra, and would have been helpful because of my family history. I was not able to fight with the insurance company for permission to obtain those extra tests, since I was already weak and ill from the chemotherapy, at that time. It is not reasonable or acceptable for women to have to fight to get necessary tests performed, because of excessive charging for those tests, and resistance of the medical insurance companies to provide coverage to obtain them. This situation needs to be changed. I hope that Angelina Jolie's story will bring attention to this issue, and will help our Supreme Court to recognize the unfairness in allowing a company to lay claim on a "patent" of our genes. The main research to provide the exact mapping of our genes was provided by the "Human Genome Project", which was primarily paid for by the US taxpayers, via that extensive NIH study. The Myriad company did some further research to refine knowledge on the BRACA genes; but they should not be allowed a total patent which blocks all other US labs from performing tests on that same part of our DNA. That is unreasonable in terms of the amount of profit they are claiming, and unfair to US humans who should be able to claim ownership of their own DNA.
Dee Baucher May 18, 2013 at 08:50 am
I am not used to Hollywood-types having the type of integrity and honesty, that Ms. Jolie displayedRead More with her NY Times revelation. I commend her for having the courage to act proactively with surgical removal of her breasts, in addition to the planned removal of her ovaries. She lost her beloved mother to the disease, and she clearly understands the devastation that would befall her own children (if she were to develop the types of cancers that her genetic makeup render her vulnerable to). I agree with her decision, and hope that I would have the same strength, if confronted with the genetic evidence that she was able to have documented with the BRACA testing. Unfortunately, many women who would benefit in the same way, from advance knowledge about their genetic vulnerability to those cancers, are denied the ability to get the tests. The company that "owns" the test, by virtue of their assertion that they "own the patent" on that identified portion of our DNA, charge $3,000.00 for the test. That cost is too high for most women in the US to easily afford, and our health insurance typically refuses to cover the test for most women. There is currently a case before the US Supreme Court challenging the idea of a medical company owning our genes. Many of us are hopeful that the court will halt this company from claiming this patent, so that laboratories all over the country can provide the test to us inexpensively, and therefore it will be available to all who should have it. The costs for the type of very sophisticated plastic surgery/ breast reconstruction that Ms. Jolie underwent, are also extremely high. It is doubtful that insurance or Obamacare will provide coverage for that type of costly prophylactic surgery. Those are battles that women will need to fight in the future, when more women become informed about their personal risks and choices.