.
Feedback

Sonoma's 'Excellent' Harvest Brings Economic Relief

Wineries are requesting more fruit from growers than last year, due to an end to the recession stockpile of wine.

In restaurants in the future, connoisseurs may very well say of Sonoma County's 2012 wine—"Ah, that was a very good year."

"The quality is fabulous," Becky Jenkins of Madrone Vineyard Management told Patch last week. "Mother Nature has looked favorably on us. We haven't had a normal season in three years," she said.

Cool summers with heat spikes and rain—even rain during harvest—made for less than desirable conditions in the past three years, she said.

But this year's yield is "excellent" according to Jenkins and Nick Frey, president of Sonoma County Wine Grape Commission. They say it could bring Sonoma's wine industry back from the effects of the recession and 9-11.

"After 9-11, people were buying less luxury," Jenkins said. "Some growers have gone into bankruptcy and foreclosure. Now, people are coming to us to ask for the grapes, rather than the other way around. If we’d had more grapes, we could have sold them. No one is going to have extra grapes this year."

Jenkins is the former president of Sonoma County Wine Grape Growers Association and is currently on the Board of Sonoma Valley Vintners and Growers Association.

The local harvest began after Labor Day and is expected to last to about Nov. 1.

"It might go longer in cooler areas," Frey said.

He said some wineries have renewed contracts this year, compared to wineries cutting back in recent years.

"We were asked to drop some of the fruit sometimes," Jenkins told Patch of the not-so-good years.

When that happens, grapes are literally allowed to fall on the vineyard floor without being sold, she said.

There are about 1,800 vineyards owned by about 1,500 growers in Sonoma county, Frey said. The average annual yield from the county is 200,000 tons of wine grapes.

"We'll top that this year but there's no estimate yet. Last year's was 166,000 tons," he said.

This year's white-wine grape harvest is now complete. The red grape picking is still under way. The quality of fruit has been high and the quantity above average in all grape varieties, but pinot noir has done especially well, Frey said.

Growers and winemakers have had a happy problem—searching for tank space and barrels for the massive yield. The harvest has gone so well that Sonoma county vineyards are getting requests for their fruit from as far away as Paso Robles, as well as Solano and Napa counties, Jenkins said. Since the harvest has been good throughout California, winemakers weren't able to find extra tank space outside the county to use either.

"Both growers and wineries are excited," he said. "The growers are getting new contracts."

A lot of labor such as leaf removal and pruning is done year-round, then harvest can be an intense time, when people bring in friends to help, Frey said.

"People work seven days a week, starting at midnight or 2 a.m. and working eight to 10 hour days," he said.

Patch asked Frey about expectations for next year.

"There were good conditions when the clusters differentiated in spring," he  said, "and that forms the crop for 2013. We're optimistic for next year."

Sonoma County Wine Grape Commission represents growers who are contracted to wineries. Two thirds of the grapes crushed in the county are grown under contract, Frey said.

The Jenkins family has been in vineyard management for 25 years. On the attached video, Becky Jenkins' son and chief of operations, Isaac, tells readers how he knows when the fruit is ripe for picking and what makes Sonoma wine so special. Patch caught up with him at Horn Vineyard, where grapes were being harvested for Benziger Winery. The work began before dawn.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Sonoma Valley Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Ralph Hutchinson May 17, 2013 at 09:38 am
Another Cuban party perhaps in the works at the Kenwood Ranch, chompin on contraband cigars, etc?Read More Grand prize trips to Cuba with Californians Building Bridges and rub elbows with fatcat Politicians? Or maybe Kings tickets?
Ralph Hutchinson May 17, 2013 at 11:37 am
What kind of conflicts of interest are present with Nancy Simpson? She is on the County Landmarks,Read More formerly affiliated with Sonoma Valley Visitors Bureau and Wendy Peterson? Are all these agencies and bureaus interlocked some receiving TOT tax revenues, and all standing to benefit from anything Darius Anderson can build?
Ralph Hutchinson May 17, 2013 at 11:32 am
Is Darius really after a casino in Sonoma either at General Vallejo State Park next to his RamekinsRead More location or up valley at Sonoma Development Center?
Ralph Hutchinson May 17, 2013 at 11:31 am
Ms. G doesn't even live in Sonoma does she? Isn't it Cloverdale? Wasn't she a big proponent of theRead More bypass in her town?
sal nero May 15, 2013 at 08:11 pm
The Sonoma Sun's website (but not SunFMTV) has been down for hours. What's happening ?
Ralph Hutchinson May 15, 2013 at 03:25 pm
Did Darius Anderso agree to buyout The Patch and have the archives and comments removed as part ofRead More this new software update? Afterall "Cows Not Casinos", Measure A Rosewood Hillside hotel, and Measure C Hospital Eminent Domain would be better if the People of Sonoma forgot all about it and let his hotel venture fly easier.
sal nero May 15, 2013 at 03:20 pm
When Bolling "lost" his comments on Sonoma Valley Bank and then the whole archive heRead More blamed a glitch yet they have never been restored. That has benefitted the Hotel Index-Tribune and allowed a cover up of key historical dates and facts. Please hurry and restore the Patch's missing blogs and comments ASAP so that the confidence the Sonoma Patch has attained is not damaged. Thanks
Ralph Hutchinson May 15, 2013 at 03:09 pm
The comments to various articles and blogs are also completely missing. Please restore asap.
Dee Baucher May 18, 2013 at 09:37 am
I write about the issue of the BRACA test, because I am someone who developed breast cancer, and whoRead More needed the test. Even though I already had breast cancer, the decision of whether to have a bilateral mastectomy (rather than just a removal of the cancer with a "lumpectomy" or the removal of only one, effected, breast) was dependent upon the results of that test. If I had a genetic marker that indicated I was likely to develop more breast cancers, there would be no reason to avoid having both breasts removed at once. Even though my doctors recognized the importance of getting this test done before surgical decisions were made, the insurance company was resistant to providing coverage for the test. There were many heated phone conversations with the insurance company, and many letters of documentation before I was finally allowed to have the test. The basic test for BRAC I and BRAC II (the 2 main genes identified) cost $3,000. However, there are even more specialized tests for the smaller BRAC genes (rare genes that are less common) that cost thousands of dollars extra, and would have been helpful because of my family history. I was not able to fight with the insurance company for permission to obtain those extra tests, since I was already weak and ill from the chemotherapy, at that time. It is not reasonable or acceptable for women to have to fight to get necessary tests performed, because of excessive charging for those tests, and resistance of the medical insurance companies to provide coverage to obtain them. This situation needs to be changed. I hope that Angelina Jolie's story will bring attention to this issue, and will help our Supreme Court to recognize the unfairness in allowing a company to lay claim on a "patent" of our genes. The main research to provide the exact mapping of our genes was provided by the "Human Genome Project", which was primarily paid for by the US taxpayers, via that extensive NIH study. The Myriad company did some further research to refine knowledge on the BRACA genes; but they should not be allowed a total patent which blocks all other US labs from performing tests on that same part of our DNA. That is unreasonable in terms of the amount of profit they are claiming, and unfair to US humans who should be able to claim ownership of their own DNA.
Dee Baucher May 18, 2013 at 08:50 am
I am not used to Hollywood-types having the type of integrity and honesty, that Ms. Jolie displayedRead More with her NY Times revelation. I commend her for having the courage to act proactively with surgical removal of her breasts, in addition to the planned removal of her ovaries. She lost her beloved mother to the disease, and she clearly understands the devastation that would befall her own children (if she were to develop the types of cancers that her genetic makeup render her vulnerable to). I agree with her decision, and hope that I would have the same strength, if confronted with the genetic evidence that she was able to have documented with the BRACA testing. Unfortunately, many women who would benefit in the same way, from advance knowledge about their genetic vulnerability to those cancers, are denied the ability to get the tests. The company that "owns" the test, by virtue of their assertion that they "own the patent" on that identified portion of our DNA, charge $3,000.00 for the test. That cost is too high for most women in the US to easily afford, and our health insurance typically refuses to cover the test for most women. There is currently a case before the US Supreme Court challenging the idea of a medical company owning our genes. Many of us are hopeful that the court will halt this company from claiming this patent, so that laboratories all over the country can provide the test to us inexpensively, and therefore it will be available to all who should have it. The costs for the type of very sophisticated plastic surgery/ breast reconstruction that Ms. Jolie underwent, are also extremely high. It is doubtful that insurance or Obamacare will provide coverage for that type of costly prophylactic surgery. Those are battles that women will need to fight in the future, when more women become informed about their personal risks and choices.