.
Feedback

Investigation of Taser Use at Sonoma Developmental Center Called For

Sonoma County D.A. Jill Ravitz responds to advocates with renewed investigation into allegations

By Bay City News Service

Advocates for the developmentally disabled Friday called for an investigation into reports 12 adults at the Sonoma Developmental Center near Sonoma were tortured with Tasers a year ago. The groups gathered at the Sonoma County Superior Courthouse, where they met with District Attorney Jill Ravitch late last month.

Members of The Arc of California, the Developmental Disability Council and the Parent Hospital Association for the Sonoma Developmental Center also urged Gov. Jerry Brown to sign five legislative bills that protect developmentally disabled persons from abuse and expedite reporting procedures.

Tony Anderson, executive director of The Arc of California, said advocates for the developmentally disabled asked Ravitch to conduct a concurrent investigation into the reports of Taser use at the Center in Eldridge on Sept. 26, 2011.

In a Sept. 12 letter to Anderson following her meeting with the advocates on Aug. 29, Ravitch said the state Office of Protective Services has reopened its investigation into the Taser allegations.

In the letter, Ravitch said her office rarely initiates independent investigations and that any such request should be made to a local law enforcement agency.

Ravitch said the county sheriff's office previously offered to assist the Office of Protective Services with the investigation. Sonoma County Sheriff Steve Freitas said the OPS declined any assistance.

Ravitch said one of her investigators will help assure the OPS investigation is thorough and complete. She said her office also has contacted the state Attorney General's Office and the FBI.

"A chief deputy district attorney has reviewed the entire case and will continue to evaluate additional reports as they are received," Ravitch said in her letter to Anderson.

"We are encouraged by this progress, but still have concerns about who is doing the investigation and how violent abuse is reported to local law enforcement agencies," Anderson said.

Anderson said the state Penal Code gives state and local law enforcement agencies "concurrent jurisdiction" to investigate elder and dependent abuse and other crimes against victims with disabilities.

According to an article published last month by California Watch, a team of reporters with the Center for Investigative Reporting, an anonymous caller accused caregiver Archie Millora of abusing at least 11 of the severely disabled patients at the Sonoma Developmental Center.

In response to the report, Sonoma County Chief Deputy District Attorney Spencer Brady said the Sonoma Developmental Center's in-house police, the Office of Protective Services, found a loaded 40-caliber Glock handgun and a Taser stun gun in Millora's vehicle after it received the anonymous tip.

The Office of Protective Services did an administrative investigation and determined the Taser in Millora's vehicle was not the weapon that was used to inflict the wounds on the patients, Brady said.

Millora was arrested on Feb. 11 on misdemeanor charges of carrying a concealed weapon in a vehicle and carrying a loaded firearm in a public place on Sept. 27, 2011, according to Sonoma County Superior Court records.

He pleaded no contest on April 2 to the concealed weapon charge and was sentenced to three years' probation and 20 days in Sonoma County Jail.

Advocates for the developmentally disabled want Gov. Brown to sign SB 1551, a bill by state Senator Mark Leno, D-San Francisco. The bill requires a developmental center to immediately report a death, sexual or physical assault to local law enforcement regardless of whether the Office of Protective Services has investigated the incident, and to prepare a written report to local law enforcement within two working days.

A bill by Assemblywoman Mariko Yamada, D-Davis, would require a mandated reporter to inform local law enforcement by phone within two hours of observing, learning of or suspecting physical abuse in a long-term care facility.

Parent Hospital Association President Kathleen Miller, whose son is living in the Sonoma Development Center, said the victims of the Taser use were patients with behavior issues.

"If it can happen there, it can happen anywhere. This is the tip of the iceberg," Miller said.

Joseph Flanagan, who was a resident of the Sonoma Developmental Center between 1955, when he was 12 years old, and 1963, said he saw patients pushed against walls, slapped, hit, knocked to the ground, struck with belts and had their beds tipped over.

"I want people to be safe and the abuse stopped. I want them to have their freedom and rights," Flanagan said.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Sonoma Valley Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Ralph Hutchinson May 18, 2013 at 08:51 pm
I still say the People will be wise to these bush league tactics and the residents of Sonoma willRead More vote against the destruction of the Plaza and our small town feel. We won''t sell out like Napa or Healdsburg and certainly we're not like the 101 corridor.
Ralph Hutchinson May 20, 2013 at 01:25 pm
I still say Preserving Sonoma will get way more than enough votes and present to City Council.Read More Instead of doing the right thing City Council will punt the ball and not vote to do the ballot anyway. They can save money and do the right thing but they are so far conflicted with Darius and his free gifts, campaign gift, parties and the like they are blinded. Same with Chamber of Commerce.
Ralph Hutchinson May 17, 2013 at 09:38 am
Another Cuban party perhaps in the works at the Kenwood Ranch, chompin on contraband cigars, etc?Read More Grand prize trips to Cuba with Californians Building Bridges and rub elbows with fatcat Politicians? Or maybe Kings tickets?
Ralph Hutchinson May 17, 2013 at 11:37 am
What kind of conflicts of interest are present with Nancy Simpson? She is on the County Landmarks,Read More formerly affiliated with Sonoma Valley Visitors Bureau and Wendy Peterson? Are all these agencies and bureaus interlocked some receiving TOT tax revenues, and all standing to benefit from anything Darius Anderson can build?
Ralph Hutchinson May 17, 2013 at 11:32 am
Is Darius really after a casino in Sonoma either at General Vallejo State Park next to his RamekinsRead More location or up valley at Sonoma Development Center?
Ralph Hutchinson May 17, 2013 at 11:31 am
Ms. G doesn't even live in Sonoma does she? Isn't it Cloverdale? Wasn't she a big proponent of theRead More bypass in her town?
sal nero May 15, 2013 at 08:11 pm
The Sonoma Sun's website (but not SunFMTV) has been down for hours. What's happening ?
Ralph Hutchinson May 15, 2013 at 03:25 pm
Did Darius Anderso agree to buyout The Patch and have the archives and comments removed as part ofRead More this new software update? Afterall "Cows Not Casinos", Measure A Rosewood Hillside hotel, and Measure C Hospital Eminent Domain would be better if the People of Sonoma forgot all about it and let his hotel venture fly easier.
sal nero May 15, 2013 at 03:20 pm
When Bolling "lost" his comments on Sonoma Valley Bank and then the whole archive heRead More blamed a glitch yet they have never been restored. That has benefitted the Hotel Index-Tribune and allowed a cover up of key historical dates and facts. Please hurry and restore the Patch's missing blogs and comments ASAP so that the confidence the Sonoma Patch has attained is not damaged. Thanks
Ralph Hutchinson May 15, 2013 at 03:09 pm
The comments to various articles and blogs are also completely missing. Please restore asap.
Dee Baucher May 18, 2013 at 09:37 am
I write about the issue of the BRACA test, because I am someone who developed breast cancer, and whoRead More needed the test. Even though I already had breast cancer, the decision of whether to have a bilateral mastectomy (rather than just a removal of the cancer with a "lumpectomy" or the removal of only one, effected, breast) was dependent upon the results of that test. If I had a genetic marker that indicated I was likely to develop more breast cancers, there would be no reason to avoid having both breasts removed at once. Even though my doctors recognized the importance of getting this test done before surgical decisions were made, the insurance company was resistant to providing coverage for the test. There were many heated phone conversations with the insurance company, and many letters of documentation before I was finally allowed to have the test. The basic test for BRAC I and BRAC II (the 2 main genes identified) cost $3,000. However, there are even more specialized tests for the smaller BRAC genes (rare genes that are less common) that cost thousands of dollars extra, and would have been helpful because of my family history. I was not able to fight with the insurance company for permission to obtain those extra tests, since I was already weak and ill from the chemotherapy, at that time. It is not reasonable or acceptable for women to have to fight to get necessary tests performed, because of excessive charging for those tests, and resistance of the medical insurance companies to provide coverage to obtain them. This situation needs to be changed. I hope that Angelina Jolie's story will bring attention to this issue, and will help our Supreme Court to recognize the unfairness in allowing a company to lay claim on a "patent" of our genes. The main research to provide the exact mapping of our genes was provided by the "Human Genome Project", which was primarily paid for by the US taxpayers, via that extensive NIH study. The Myriad company did some further research to refine knowledge on the BRACA genes; but they should not be allowed a total patent which blocks all other US labs from performing tests on that same part of our DNA. That is unreasonable in terms of the amount of profit they are claiming, and unfair to US humans who should be able to claim ownership of their own DNA.
Dee Baucher May 18, 2013 at 08:50 am
I am not used to Hollywood-types having the type of integrity and honesty, that Ms. Jolie displayedRead More with her NY Times revelation. I commend her for having the courage to act proactively with surgical removal of her breasts, in addition to the planned removal of her ovaries. She lost her beloved mother to the disease, and she clearly understands the devastation that would befall her own children (if she were to develop the types of cancers that her genetic makeup render her vulnerable to). I agree with her decision, and hope that I would have the same strength, if confronted with the genetic evidence that she was able to have documented with the BRACA testing. Unfortunately, many women who would benefit in the same way, from advance knowledge about their genetic vulnerability to those cancers, are denied the ability to get the tests. The company that "owns" the test, by virtue of their assertion that they "own the patent" on that identified portion of our DNA, charge $3,000.00 for the test. That cost is too high for most women in the US to easily afford, and our health insurance typically refuses to cover the test for most women. There is currently a case before the US Supreme Court challenging the idea of a medical company owning our genes. Many of us are hopeful that the court will halt this company from claiming this patent, so that laboratories all over the country can provide the test to us inexpensively, and therefore it will be available to all who should have it. The costs for the type of very sophisticated plastic surgery/ breast reconstruction that Ms. Jolie underwent, are also extremely high. It is doubtful that insurance or Obamacare will provide coverage for that type of costly prophylactic surgery. Those are battles that women will need to fight in the future, when more women become informed about their personal risks and choices.