Faith Lutheran Church will host "A Christmas Market" craft fair on Saturday, December 1st, from 10 am to 4 pm. At the craft fair, over 20 vendors will offer a wide variety of unique, handmade gifts, jewelry, ornaments, decorations, food, and much more. Admission is free, and gift wrapping is available. Faith Lutheran is located at 19355 Arnold Drive, Sonoma.
"A Christmas Market" Craft Fair
19355 Arnold Dr
Sonoma CA
95476 See map
Comments + Leave a Comment
Loading comments ...
Boards
All Boards »
sal nero May 21, 2013 at 03:47 pm
I love Larry's response in the above I-T link's comments. He illustrates how a cute turn of a phrase…Read More by Bolling here and there add up to journalistic bias and an effort to shade reality. Did I say shade because I meant lie so much as to ape Charles Foster Kane (Citizen Kane) ! The Hotel Index-Tribune. Yellow Journalism for the modern age.
Ralph Hutchinson May 21, 2013 at 09:28 am
Bolling is a liar, many of the grassroots effort including myself have written Letters to the Index…Read More Tribune. He declares he won't print anything I write documenting a personal bias. I know of several others. There are Letters lying on the floor and jammed into the online upload tool the Index Tribune is not running. Period. Its one-sided because they are all sell-outs and conflicted. Everybody knows it. Its absolutely hilarious when he does write like he did in today's IT burying an Op-Ed piece under some Minidoka title because it only shows his true colors and shows the rest of the Valley how deparate he really is. The more be makes his declarations, the sillier he looks. Go ahead Bolling, keep digging your hole. The whole Valley is watching and frankly, this story might get regional or National news before the election so you will be famous as a bush-league wanna be journalist of a crony operation in a corrupt town which you helped create with your newspaper.
sal nero May 21, 2013 at 09:24 am
Has ANYONE (including all partners) at the Hotel Index-Tribune taken the "NO CASINO"…Read More pledge ? Nope. Not a one. Has anyone taken a "Defense of the Developmentally Disabled" pledge to keep them at SDC rather than put them into the general population? NOPE! After 35 Hotel Index-Tribune articles the reason is pretty clear isn't it ? Using the situation at SDC to gain leverage for personal profit is contemptible and SICK !
sal nero May 21, 2013 at 01:09 pm
The UFC's owners are the Fertitta Bros., Station Casino's owners. They bought it for $1MM in 2001.…Read More Station filed for bankruptcy a couple of years ago on the Casino business part of the empire wiping out shareholders. The UFC was under this other shell and the profits have continued rolling in. Yeah, yeah I know its aaaaall legal.
Remember Leon Shahinian? The Calpers guy who went to Darius' house and then a MMA bout with either Darius or Kirk (he couldn't recall which)?
http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/money_co/2010/08/darius-anderson-under-scope-of-calpers-pension-probe.html
Birds of a feather...
Ralph Hutchinson May 21, 2013 at 11:49 am
Flights, fight tickets, rooms and food in exchange for votes? More examples of quality ethics like…Read More those practices creeping into Sonoma Valley courtesy of Darius Anderson and his Pay to Play tactics.
Ralph Hutchinson May 21, 2013 at 09:33 am
We need a graphic poll and it needs to stay up on the front page for a week to get a good read.…Read More Things scroll down out of sight too often especially important topics. Other Patch articles seem to stay up for days. Can you lock it in this time?
Ralph Hutchinson May 18, 2013 at 08:51 pm
I still say the People will be wise to these bush league tactics and the residents of Sonoma will…Read More vote against the destruction of the Plaza and our small town feel. We won''t sell out like Napa or Healdsburg and certainly we're not like the 101 corridor.
Ralph Hutchinson May 20, 2013 at 01:25 pm
I still say Preserving Sonoma will get way more than enough votes and present to City Council.…Read More Instead of doing the right thing City Council will punt the ball and not vote to do the ballot anyway. They can save money and do the right thing but they are so far conflicted with Darius and his free gifts, campaign gift, parties and the like they are blinded. Same with Chamber of Commerce.
Ralph Hutchinson May 17, 2013 at 09:38 am
Another Cuban party perhaps in the works at the Kenwood Ranch, chompin on contraband cigars, etc?…Read More Grand prize trips to Cuba with Californians Building Bridges and rub elbows with fatcat Politicians? Or maybe Kings tickets?
Ralph Hutchinson May 17, 2013 at 11:37 am
What kind of conflicts of interest are present with Nancy Simpson? She is on the County Landmarks,…Read More formerly affiliated with Sonoma Valley Visitors Bureau and Wendy Peterson? Are all these agencies and bureaus interlocked some receiving TOT tax revenues, and all standing to benefit from anything Darius Anderson can build?
Ralph Hutchinson May 17, 2013 at 11:32 am
Is Darius really after a casino in Sonoma either at General Vallejo State Park next to his Ramekins…Read More location or up valley at Sonoma Development Center?
Ralph Hutchinson May 17, 2013 at 11:31 am
Ms. G doesn't even live in Sonoma does she? Isn't it Cloverdale? Wasn't she a big proponent of the…Read More bypass in her town?
sal nero May 15, 2013 at 08:11 pm
The Sonoma Sun's website (but not SunFMTV) has been down for hours. What's happening ?
Ralph Hutchinson May 15, 2013 at 03:25 pm
Did Darius Anderso agree to buyout The Patch and have the archives and comments removed as part of…Read More this new software update?
Afterall "Cows Not Casinos", Measure A Rosewood Hillside hotel, and Measure C Hospital Eminent Domain would be better if the People of Sonoma forgot all about it and let his hotel venture fly easier.
sal nero May 15, 2013 at 03:20 pm
When Bolling "lost" his comments on Sonoma Valley Bank and then the whole archive he…Read More blamed a glitch yet they have never been restored. That has benefitted the Hotel Index-Tribune and allowed a cover up of key historical dates and facts.
Please hurry and restore the Patch's missing blogs and comments ASAP so that the confidence the Sonoma Patch has attained is not damaged. Thanks
Ralph Hutchinson May 15, 2013 at 03:09 pm
The comments to various articles and blogs are also completely missing. Please restore asap.
Dee Baucher May 18, 2013 at 09:37 am
I write about the issue of the BRACA test, because I am someone who developed breast cancer, and who…Read More needed the test. Even though I already had breast cancer, the decision of whether to have a bilateral mastectomy (rather than just a removal of the cancer with a "lumpectomy" or the removal of only one, effected, breast) was dependent upon the results of that test. If I had a genetic marker that indicated I was likely to develop more breast cancers, there would be no reason to avoid having both breasts removed at once. Even though my doctors recognized the importance of getting this test done before surgical decisions were made, the insurance company was resistant to providing coverage for the test. There were many heated phone conversations with the insurance company, and many letters of documentation before I was finally allowed to have the test. The basic test for BRAC I and BRAC II (the 2 main genes identified) cost $3,000. However, there are even more specialized tests for the smaller BRAC genes (rare genes that are less common) that cost thousands of dollars extra, and would have been helpful because of my family history. I was not able to fight with the insurance company for permission to obtain those extra tests, since I was already weak and ill from the chemotherapy, at that time. It is not reasonable or acceptable for women to have to fight to get necessary tests performed, because of excessive charging for those tests, and resistance of the medical insurance companies to provide coverage to obtain them. This situation needs to be changed. I hope that Angelina Jolie's story will bring attention to this issue, and will help our Supreme Court to recognize the unfairness in allowing a company to lay claim on a "patent" of our genes. The main research to provide the exact mapping of our genes was provided by the "Human Genome Project", which was primarily paid for by the US taxpayers, via that extensive NIH study. The Myriad company did some further research to refine knowledge on the BRACA genes; but they should not be allowed a total patent which blocks all other US labs from performing tests on that same part of our DNA. That is unreasonable in terms of the amount of profit they are claiming, and unfair to US humans who should be able to claim ownership of their own DNA.
Dee Baucher May 18, 2013 at 08:50 am
I am not used to Hollywood-types having the type of integrity and honesty, that Ms. Jolie displayed…Read More with her NY Times revelation. I commend her for having the courage to act proactively with surgical removal of her breasts, in addition to the planned removal of her ovaries. She lost her beloved mother to the disease, and she clearly understands the devastation that would befall her own children (if she were to develop the types of cancers that her genetic makeup render her vulnerable to). I agree with her decision, and hope that I would have the same strength, if confronted with the genetic evidence that she was able to have documented with the BRACA testing. Unfortunately, many women who would benefit in the same way, from advance knowledge about their genetic vulnerability to those cancers, are denied the ability to get the tests. The company that "owns" the test, by virtue of their assertion that they "own the patent" on that identified portion of our DNA, charge $3,000.00 for the test. That cost is too high for most women in the US to easily afford, and our health insurance typically refuses to cover the test for most women. There is currently a case before the US Supreme Court challenging the idea of a medical company owning our genes. Many of us are hopeful that the court will halt this company from claiming this patent, so that laboratories all over the country can provide the test to us inexpensively, and therefore it will be available to all who should have it. The costs for the type of very sophisticated plastic surgery/ breast reconstruction that Ms. Jolie underwent, are also extremely high. It is doubtful that insurance or Obamacare will provide coverage for that type of costly prophylactic surgery. Those are battles that women will need to fight in the future, when more women become informed about their personal risks and choices.
sam oliva May 15, 2013 at 05:55 am
racist organization........yet never stops whining about racial profiling!