.
Feedback

Napa Man Dies in Accident South of Sonoma

Mark Steven Heinemann died on Highway 121 Saturday, after losing control of his vehicle.

A 50-year-old man died after losing control of his car in the rain on Highway 121 south of Sonoma on Saturday.

Mark Steven Heinemann was traveling southbound when his Porsche turned sideways on a curve, Highway Patrol Officer John Bigelow told Patch. The vehicle crossed into the northbound lane and was broadsided by an oncoming car.

Heineman, a Napa resident, died at the scene, Bigeolow said. His passenger and the driver of the oncoming Chrysler PT Cruiser were transported to local hospitals with minor injuries.

The accident happened just south of Viansa Winery, at about 2:30 p.m.

Bigelow said Heinemann had been driving too fast for the conditions.

The speed of the vehicle, was unknown, Bigelow said.

"Just based on what happened, it appears he was going too fast," he said.

Christian Kallen December 25, 2012 at 01:59 pm
I'm taking down a couple comments that are directly and personally insulting, and future comments on this article will be approved by the editor before they are published, so you may not see them right away. Please in what they call the spirit of the season, be generous with your thoughts. Merry Christmas.
Vicki Wolf December 25, 2012 at 02:02 pm
Thank you Shelly! Well said. Free speech is a wonderful thing until it is said with vile
and misunderstanding, and a hard heart. I always think when I read poorly worded comments that what goes around comes around. One can NEVER understand until it happens close to home in some way. However everyone can question in a kind manner if they choose to.....
MICHAEL P WILSON "Independent Kid" December 25, 2012 at 07:46 pm
Shandra the comments are constructive We debate news topics on this site. The simple fact the story made the news opens it up for discussion. I agree that the full story needs to come from the CHP and witness statements. I also agree with Christian Kallen taking some a personally insulting posts away this is a website with rules. We must assume that weather and road conditions, Had a major role in the crash. Please continue to discuss this topic with us as the story unfolds.
Sarah M. December 25, 2012 at 11:41 pm
Thanks to all those who left kind, thoughtful comments. To those who did not, my response is simply that I normally don't respond to online comments for just this reason. In this case, I felt the need to make an exception. Mark was my brother in law, and regardless of the circumstances, this is a tragedy for those who knew and loved him. Again, thanks to all those who expressed their condolences.
Sarah M. December 25, 2012 at 11:43 pm
Mark was my brother in law. I certainly am glad that your MIL is recovering. Thank you for your comments - so well said. Rest assured that Mark's passenger is recovering as well and yes, she is a relative.
Segway Napa December 26, 2012 at 12:10 am
I'm so very sorry to hear this. Mark was such a nice guy, he had a smile for everyone.
Nile Z December 26, 2012 at 02:16 pm
Mark was a friend and colleague of mine. His passing is a reminder to all of us to slow down and appreciate those around us and the moments that we have with them. He will be missed as will his wonderful spirit of life. Our love goes out to all affected in this tragedy.
Shandra Knego December 26, 2012 at 02:56 pm
To Sarah M - I'm so glad to hear Mark's daughter is recovering and we are so incredibly sad for your loss. I can only imagine how difficult & painful this holiday season is for you & the rest of Mark's family. You have our deepest condolences.
CanadianinNapa December 27, 2012 at 12:33 pm
Not cool people
: "driving too fast for the conditions... The speed of the vehicle, was unknown"...then how do they know he was driving too fast if 'The speed of the vehicle, was unknown' Leave the families alone. Merry Christmas
Mark Mathews December 27, 2012 at 10:56 pm
Who made you moderator? When did this become a page for other than questioning comments?
Mark Mathews December 27, 2012 at 10:59 pm
For all of you who have taken issue with my comments; It was the story, not I, which stated qualified and experienced on-scene law enforcement reported that speed was involved; was the Officer insensitive to have volunteered that data? Should he have said “No Comment?” Should law enforcement refuse to provide ANY pertinent information relating to such an accident until some undefined time span expires for sympathetic reflections and mourning?
Having driven, accident free, for over four decades (and often AT the scene where this accident occurred) and having seen the results of too many speeding drivers (not the vehicles, the drivers) and not desiring to wait until I, a relative of mine, nor any other driver becomes yet another victim of a speeding driver (again, the story); and being utterly fed up with being passed, one after another, day by day, by mostly Mercedes, Beamers and yes, Porches, I offer my own anger back at you. I am fed up with speeders… I suppose some out there are not, unwilling to lay blame where it belongs, according to professional investigators who were at the scene and reported here. This is a news comment section, not the memorial board of a memorial funeral home.
Cam December 28, 2012 at 01:17 am
I agree with Mark Mathews point & see nothing wrong with his comments & questions. There were others hurt in this accident that I also feel are being too quickly shoved aside to "be respectful" to the deceased driver's family. His reportedly faulty judgement & actions SHOULD be discussed in this open forum, because many of us make exactly the same poor judgements. Where I don't agree is the name-calling or 'holier-than-thou' judgements that serve no purpose in looking at an issue that could hit any one of us. Nice guys do make poor choices, too. My sympathies to all the families involved.
MICHAEL P WILSON "Independent Kid" December 28, 2012 at 03:14 pm
I agree with Mark and cams 12/27 points. Patch any update to this story will you post when and if?
Julie Pendray (Editor) December 28, 2012 at 07:17 pm
I spoke with the Coroner's office. An autopsy was performed Dec. 24th, & it included toxicology tests. Results won't be returned for about another month, due to the holidays. Normal turn-around is 3.5 to 4 weeks. Toxicology tests are mandatory on all vehicle accidents, the staff person told me, so I would add that this, in itself, indicates nothing different than the story mentioned. I am simply addressing readers' questions & concerns in this thread.
Julie Pendray (Editor) December 28, 2012 at 07:58 pm
Also, as with any accident, law enforcement officers arrive after the accident, not as it is happening. They make their assessments to the best of their knowledge at the time, by looking at the road conditions, vehicle damage, how the vehicle traveled across the road, talking to witnesses, etc. But at the end of the day, it is an assessment only, based on how things appeared. I don't imagine they intend it as a judgment. Autopsies shed more light, if there is, in fact, any more to learn. Regardless, we send our condolences to Heinemann's loved ones & wishes for recovery for all impacted by this event.
Rick R. Johnson December 28, 2012 at 09:20 pm
Amy, I was 4 cars behind the PT Cruiser that hit Mark. It did not appear to me that Mark was going too fast. It was drizzly and overcast and sometimes stuff just happens. We were there for about an hour while CHP and the Fire Department did their best to help. Mark was dead on impact. My thoughts and prayers are wity you and your family. My condolences. God bless.
K December 28, 2012 at 11:41 pm
Nice assumptions Mark...NOT!!!!! He did not have an estate. Mark was a friend of the family how about some compassion. He paid the ultimate price, isn't that enough? It is sad indeed that people are hurt one of them is his family member who will now have to go on without him. Should those of us left behind have to hear the painful comments left behind by all of you who feel the need to be lacking in compassion. I am sure you have never driven over the speed limit right? Thank you George and Jan (below for you compassion.
Charlie Potatoe December 29, 2012 at 05:19 am
Perhaps you ought to sleep on it before posting such a judgmental comment. We all read the account, and yes, we all know that one slows down in the rain. But a man's life has ended-it's over. Have some reverence and respect for that fact alone. You can dance the superior dance in a few days just hold off for a spell.
PS. And too many people are writing 'to' instead of 'too'. Come on, I am assuming you're all adults. Okay, except for Michael Keaton here (Republican Kid).
Chuck Dyson December 29, 2012 at 01:06 pm
Mark Mathews needs to get a life. Only a person who is lacking many things in their own life would make the comments that you have made. The problem with the world today is people judge and say insensitive and inaccurate things without truly knowing the facts. You actually thinking your comments are acceptable and those that have agreed with you just don't get it. Being inappropriate is quite chic these days...you are not alone. Classy behavior seems to be reserved for the minority. I suspect if you are wrong an apology will be forthcoming????
Yeh right
MICHAEL P WILSON "Independent Kid" December 29, 2012 at 03:38 pm
Chuck Mark Mathews Has a right to his opinion. Chuck you have a right to yours. We will not know if drugs or alcohol played a part in the wreck for some time. It could have been bad driving or just the rain. Question to the Family posting here. Has Mr Heinemanns passinger given any indication as to what took place?
Rich Tanguay December 29, 2012 at 04:47 pm
I am so sorry for your loss Amy and the whole Heinemann family. I knew and worked with Mark (ordered his barrels) over the years and he was a wonderful man.
Lynn December 30, 2012 at 03:54 am
I agree Patrick, good comment. In other words Driving to fast for conditions is different than going over speed limit ... and there is no facts listed here of actual speed of car at time of accident, only rude false accusations trying to defame a genuinely smart sincere friendly and kind hearted neighbor of mine. Nice to see the good hearts of those who have posted genuine concern for all affected and I agree SHAME On those of you who are RUDE and RUDELY putting out selfish self centered gossip at a time like this before all the facts are in or just in general being insensitive to all concerned
Shelly December 30, 2012 at 11:21 am
How nice it is to read Rick R. Johnsons comments. The comments are getting posted out of order, so its good to hear from someone who was actually there on sight...instead of speculating & leaving rude, insensitive comments. Maybe this will help keep Mark Mathews quiet. As K said...Mark lost his life...he has paid the ultimate price? We don't need to hear comments about how much Mark Mathews hates speeders. We get it! Editor - for the respect of the Heinemann family, please do not allow the insensitive comments to be posted. You block comments from people who have defended Mark H. to proctect his dignity, but allow the insensitive rants & personal attacks against a man who is no longer here to defend himself?
Julie Pendray (Editor) December 30, 2012 at 03:20 pm
Comments are being viewed by Napa and Sonoma editors before they're posted, so you may see a tiny time lapse before they appear. We did take action regarding some of the comments. Some inflammatory ones were removed & one poster was suspended several days ago due to the nature of the repeated comments. That said, this is a news site and readers do have the right to comment on news articles from their viewpoint, as long as they abide by our terms of use & are not not repeatedly derogatory, etc. I'm not familiar with anything in defense of the driver that was removed. Your point is well taken, though Shelly. Thank you for contributing.
MICHAEL P WILSON "Independent Kid" December 30, 2012 at 03:29 pm
Thanks Julie Some only want the free press to report on convenient to them stories. Thanks to the whole patch netwark. Happy New Year all
Julie Pendray (Editor) December 30, 2012 at 03:48 pm
Happy New Year to you too. On a more cheerful note, here's a recap of video from the year in Sonoma Valley http://patch.com/A-0GKN Not sure if you are from Napa or Sonoma. Gorgeous place to live, on either side of the hill. :)
Shelly December 30, 2012 at 04:39 pm
Thank you, Julie. I understand that everyone has a right to say how they feel. But the comments from two individuals were completely uncalled for (one person inparticular). A 15 year old & a 17 year old has lost their father. One of whom was traveling with him. These girls are going through enough & I would sure hate for one of them to read these rude comments about their father. My daughter is one of Mark's daughters best friends. She was appalled after reading the heartless comments & said she hopes her friend never reads them. For those that knew Mark, understand why these comments are unnecessary. He was the most genuine, caring man, who always had a smile on his face.
Shelly December 30, 2012 at 04:45 pm
And to Republican Kid with your upside down flag...of course I'm going to comment on an article when I know the person involved who is being slandered by you & Mark Mathews. I'm apologize that I'm a busy career woman & Mom of three that doesn't sit around & blog on every article posted. Happy New Year! Let it be POSITIVE New Year!
Christian Kallen December 30, 2012 at 10:12 pm
The Napa Register ran an obituary for Mark Heinemann on Saturday; here is the link.
http://napavalleyregister.com/obituaries/mark-steven-heinemann/article_968eb626-4ff7-11e2-87c5-0019bb2963f4.html
MICHAEL P WILSON "Independent Kid" January 11, 2013 at 07:06 pm
Patch staff any update to this story?

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Sonoma Valley Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Ralph Hutchinson June 13, 2013 at 03:22 pm
Rumors are that the Chamber of Commerce, Grange, Vintners & Growers, Hotel Owners, RestaurantsRead More and many other small businesses are jumping on the Living Wage bandwagon started by Darius Anderson and his proposed 59 room hotel Project Sonoma formerly Chateau Sonoma. Darius partnered with Ben Boyce known local supporter and leader for Living Wage public policy to formulate a plan and press campaign for his hotel. They both rolled it out simultaneously in the Index Tribune and Sonoma Sun a few weeks ago. The Facebook page from Kenwood Investments now titled Sonoma Hotel Project linked the article and applauded Ben Boyce's literary efforts citing it as a great article. Its unclear what impact this move by Anderson may have on the Federated Indians of Graton Rancheria casino in Rohnert Park. Station Casinos the operating company and client of Darius Anderson from Las Vegas has a checkered past in dealing with organizing labor the various applicable unions. A simple Google search will reveal loads of negative press on Station Casinos and labor relationships as well as sanctions and complaints. Darius Anderson and his policy has the chance to make a major impact on casino wage policy. Afterall Darius is responsible for bringing us Cows Not Casinos to Sonoma Valley back in 2003. It is possible this wave of Living Wages policy could also spread wildly throughout the State with all of Darius Anderson's contacts as a lobbyists and consultant. At least to the various Station Casinos affiliated casinos. This strategic alliance of Anderson and Boyce on Living Wages could in fact make him a "poster child" or sorts and further the agenda throughout the County and beyond. Many are starting to formulate different opinions about Darius Anderson one not just of personal profiting off the backs of others, but in giving back to the working class and ensuring reasonable wages and benefits. This could boost his public image in Sonoma Valley. It remains to be seen if he can use his lobbying skills to turn the local business community into supporting Living Wages as they typically are dead set against. The local grape growers and wineries may also likely come around since they are all seemingly so closely ties to the hotel growth initiative then they must also be supporters of Living Wage efforts recently launched.
sal nero June 18, 2013 at 02:45 pm
OMG ! Could it really be true? Darius has a benevolent side? Unions and living wages and fairRead More treatment not just for hotel workers but everyone. Wineries, restaurants stores... This is such great news. Thank you very much !!!
Ralph Hutchinson June 18, 2013 at 03:17 pm
The grassroots understands the National Press has been alerted to Darius Anderson's stance on LivingRead More Wages with the Sonoma Hotel Project of Kenwood Investments and will be watching closely. This could become a National "feel good" story on one of the evening magazine programs before year-end. This move has really become a game changer in Sonoma. I still can't figure out how Darius got the Chamber of Commerce, and the conservatives to go along with his idea to sweeten the pot for his new hotel. Labor Costs could double for most Sonoma small businesses thanks to Darius Andersons personal powerplay. How in the world does he explain that to his constituent group?
Ralph Hutchinson June 18, 2013 at 10:00 am
Waste of time and City resources to think they can impact Federal policy. Why not focus on theRead More Living Wages wave started by this hotel debate. Council has a chance to see the entire city, hotel, tourism, restaurants, vineyard workers, and retail workforce get on board and turn the Chamber of Commerce position toward helping those in need, Sonoma's working class. Come on City Council, do whats right for Sonoma and focus on what you have the power to influence not on what makes you all look best politically or what pays back a favor to someone you owe.
sal nero June 13, 2013 at 07:50 am
Isn't it astounding that someone who purports to be a protector of the public's trust/news couldRead More nakedly shill for their own and their partner's profit? It was only 10 short years ago that The Lynchs had the Sons of the Golden West historically dedicate the Index-Tribune Building with a commemorative plaque. If they weren't to be believed back then why should we believe them now? On top of that, selling to someone who is a regular redeveloper is a very bad sign for Sonoma. On top of that, selling to the very one who's proposed Sonoma's Casino Bill Lynch described as "a nightmare" (4/23/03 I-T Op-Ed) is as hypocritical and cynical a move as can be imagined. There isn't enough shame to heap on them!
Ralph Hutchinson June 13, 2013 at 09:33 am
Crony newspaper used to serve Lynch and his cronies now just shifted over to serve Darius AndersonRead More interests and that circle of cronies. Just a mouthpiece to tout personal interests not cover any fair and balanced news. Whats funny is Bolling routinely screams how he is independent and publishes anything he wants not what Darius tells him to. Well Bolling...the general public see it differently and this is yet another example. Actions speak louder than words.
Chris Scott June 14, 2013 at 11:36 pm
Mr Nero ; In the IT letter to the editor (LTE) you refer to I showed Mr Kozel that in the fall ofRead More 2012 Ms Hainstock never wrote a letter supporting Valerie Brown's candidacy..Valerie Brown was not running for supervisor in 2012............................[ Link to the Mr Kozel's IT LTE: http://www.sonomanews.com/News-2013/No-hell-to-pay-for-no-disclosure/ ] which contains links to Ms Hainstock's LTE in the PD and IT (the same letter appeared in both papers.)..... .............. Ms Hainstock did write a letter supporting the candidacy of Mr. Sawyer who was running for Supervisor. ........................... Please let me know if you need any further assistance. Just post your contact info here and I'll get in contact. ........................Chris Scott .................................................................................................................. PS: The formatting is so screwed up because the editor does not recognize or insert page or paragraph breaks. I had a better text editor 25 years ago writing assembly code under UNIX. Them were 'da days!
Ralph Hutchinson June 12, 2013 at 02:00 pm
FROM HIS MPR WEBSITE: Most recently, he handled the controversial March 2007, Measure B campaign, aRead More parcel tax increase for the Sonoma Valley Health Care District that increases the funding for their local hospital over the next five years. There was mass confusion and controversy amongst voters as it relates to the hospital. The polling indicated that the highest watermark for Measure B was 59%. The campaign needed 67% to be successful. Measure B passed with 74% of the vote.
Ralph Hutchinson June 12, 2013 at 02:07 pm
Wasn't Ron Burkle, Darius Andersons old mentor from Ralph's Grocery Stores-Yucaipa? And Doesn'tRead More Darius host State Assemblymen from San Luis Obispo on junkets to Cuba and aren't these same Assemblymen from San Luis Obispo where another big Development Center a sister to Sonoma Development Center reside. Are we starting to see the same patterns of cronies popping up again? Any other names below on Darius Anderson's like of clients he lobbies for and also connected to Muelrath? From his MPR Website: His work for previous clients includes consulting for Waste Management, Ralphs Grocery Stores, Sprint PCS, and Chevron, directing public affairs/grassroots lobbying programs. He also assisted in crisis management for Mobil Oil Corporation. Mr. Muelrath attended California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo and studied Agricultural Science and Political Science.
sal nero June 12, 2013 at 05:43 pm
Burkle recently assisted Anderson in Sacramento to retain the NBA team before exiting, assuringRead More redevelopment of speculative property purchased by Anderson. They have worked on several developments including Treasure Island, which lost its Chinese financing partner only very recently. These guys do the same things over and over. Is it really a stretch to imagine a Casino locally? Just keep whispering to yourself "it can't happen here, can't It?" Hey Dorothy, you're not in Kansas anymore !!!
sal nero June 11, 2013 at 01:53 pm
Will he pay a living wage at the new CASINO in Eldridge formerly known as SDC? Will former residentsRead More be forced to scrub the floors? Reminds one of "David Copperfield."
Ralph Hutchinson June 11, 2013 at 01:55 pm
A groundswell is rumored on the wake of Darius Anderson's announcement that his new Project SonomaRead More Hotel would be paying Living Wages, a host of challenges and interest has been growing in the fact that this move may cause all the other Sonoma Valley hotels to pay Living Wages. But it hasn't stopped there, the local restaurants, the Chamber of Commerce, the Rotary Club, The Vintners and Growers Association, even the Rohnert Park Casino has been rumored to be considering Living Wages and/or Organizing Labor. Darius Anderson may well have started a push that could put Sonoma County on he map for progressive liberal wage policy and become a model for the rest of America.
Ralph Hutchinson June 11, 2013 at 02:03 pm
Is Darius Anderson planning on developing the Sonoma Development Center? Didn't Dave Bolling sayRead More his boss was interested? Where will all the innocent residents go if the SDC is closed? All that for a casino, hotel, and some retail stores? Can Arnold Drive even handle that? Hey, where are the SAVE ARNOLD DRIVE people let's awaken that sleeping giant and see if Darius still wants to try to develop SDC huh? You know Darius just doesn't do his homework research when trying things in Sonoma Valley does he?
sal nero June 17, 2013 at 08:46 am
No we are just experts on the "INTERNETS."
Chris Scott June 18, 2013 at 10:41 am
Mr. Hutchinson; Patience is a virtue. One should always practice virtues. We viewed your post atRead More the time of this writing. Presented with an opportunity today.
Chris Scott June 18, 2013 at 01:18 pm
Mr Hutchinson; How many comments of yours and mine are you going to delete or have deleted today?
Ralph Hutchinson June 7, 2013 at 03:15 pm
Will the casino in Rohnert Park also get looped in with Living Wages and full Union Shop status? IsRead More Ben Boyce working on that project now? Perhaps the new relationship forged on the Hotel Index Tribune with Boyce, can lead to Darius introducing him to the Station Casino people so Ben can discuss the benefits to the Las Vegas casino people? Perhaps Ben can also introduce the various Unions to the applicable parts of the casino operation as well? Gee this relationship just may change the way the entire Northbay Labor Relationships will go?
Will Shonbrun June 8, 2013 at 10:13 am
I applaud and encourage all Sonoma hotels to pay All their employees a living wage. I trust thatRead More Kenwood Investments will pay a living wage in whatever enterprises they now own or will own. And most importantly we can now expect all Sonoma hotels, vintners and growers to do likewise. Kudos to these good business folks for finally seeing the light and embracing just wages. Just think of the great public relations this progressive step will have on future tourism: Sonoma acts to defeat poverty! Does it get any better than this? Chamber of Commerce, are you now aboard?
Ralph Hutchinson June 11, 2013 at 01:36 pm
Maybe the Grange will also get onboard with Living Wages after whipping up the oyster debate into aRead More froth? Yannick?.....any interest in a little grassroots movement to make a real difference here in Sonoma Valley instead of the oyster farms in Marin? The Chamber of Commerce, the Rotary, The Grange, the Vintners and Growers Association....just imagine the movement that Darius Anderson principal of Kenwood Investments developer for the infamous Chateau Sonoma French style Hotel now a Jack London theme so we hear. Lets march on to the Rohnert park Casino and organize their Unions as well for Station Casino, Darius Anderson's consulting client who has a very poor relationship with organized labor in Las Vegas. A change to right the wrongs...time will tell.
sal nero June 7, 2013 at 08:59 am
"Protect Sonoma" is a political action committee paid for by the currently proposed 59Read More room hotel's chief partner, Darius Anderson. It must not be forgotten that 10 years ago he attempted, against Sonoma's wishes, to shove an Indian Casino down our throats. Its fair to ask why his prospective competitors would now back him. They had to be promised something, right? What was it? Could it be they were promised higher year 'round room occupancy by way of a nearby CASINO? Since he won't apologize or even acknowledge his role in that endeavor 10 years ago suspicions are appropriate. Otherwise why wouldn't he publicly reassure Sonoma that another CASINO attempt isn't in the wings in an effort to sweeten the pot and gain support for his oversized Plaza hotel proposal, right? Shouldn't trust be earned?
Ralph Hutchinson June 7, 2013 at 11:03 am
Last year the hotels begged for promotion dollars, this year they want to dilute the market byRead More flooding new inventory. For some reason this seems hypocritical and poor policy. There must be some other promises on the table because it doesn't seem realistic to support overbuilding into an already soft market. Is there some referral game going on? Some promise of Hollywood packing the streets of Sonomawood? Something is just odd here.
Chris Scott June 7, 2013 at 10:20 pm
Mr Nero, Mr Hutchinson; Thanks. Did not notice the scroll bar on the right. That’s aRead More beginning of the committee’s disclosure. Still need the balance; the same as for any initiative. You’ve seen this as shown for any voter’s handbook and on any initiative’s web site. Also committee members comments/posts signature includes “Member of (or affiliated with) PSC.” Transparency. Chris Scott
Chris Scott June 8, 2013 at 06:37 am
thank you, your prayers worked. Chris Scott
Ralph Hutchinson June 9, 2013 at 10:32 pm
What the heck are you talking about Chris?