.
Feedback

Paul's Resort Was 'Jumping Spot' in 1920s—Sonoma Mourns Loss

El Verano landmark was the scene of 'good old times.'

Update Saturday: Sonoma Valley Fire & Rescue has told Patch that the field work for the investigation is finished. The results should be released to the public early next week.

Original Story:

Paul's Resort in El Verano was "the jumping spot" in its hey day, according to Sonomans. But on Thursday, the long-vacant former dance club near Maxwell Park erupted into flames and was destroyed.

The blaze was reported at about 2:30 a.m. and it took firefighters until nearly daylight to quench it. Its cause was still under investigation late Thursday afternoon.

Fire authorities initially reported what they thought was a "possible explosive device." But the Sheriff's Bomb Squad later determined it to be an "anti-tank round" stored among other collectibles belonging to a friend of the owner.

As residents heard about the conflagration, many drove by or walked to the spot to reflect on the loss of the landmark. One elderly neighbor described the scene as "shocking."

Another resident who said she rents a place behind the old resort said she was awakened at 2:45 a.m. by someone knocking on her door to tell her about the fire. Authorities later told Patch that no one needed to be evacuated.

Other people visiting the spot Thursday recalled going there decades ago, during "good old times for people."

"I used to come here with my parents for dinner when I was about 8 to 12 years old in the 1950s and '60s," Mike Duane of Kenwood told Patch. He remembers hearing about a lot of bands that played there.

Later in the day, Jason Bell, a volunteer with Sonoma League for Historic Preservation, recalled going there for Christmas parties with his family when the building was used as the Moose Lodge.

"It was a big part of my life and a big part of Sonoma life," he told Patch.

According to various historical sources, the property has been in the ownership of the Marcucci family for decades. Family members were at the scene after the fire, assessing damage but were not readily available for an interview.

The building was reportedly constructed in about 1908. Over the years, it has been used as a bar, restaurant, train depot, Moose Lodge and meeting location for local organizations.

City of Sonoma historian George McKale told Patch, "It's well-named 'Paul's Resort,' because it was owned by three Pauls. Paul Marcucci Sr. built it in 1908 and it was known as Paul's Resort then. San Francisco socialites would be ferried over and they'd catch the train to the depot at the back of the building. The train tracks went where the bike trail is now in Sonoma."

McKale said the resort was sold during the Depression and Prohibition to Paul Vannucchi.

"It was known as a place where you could call in and get a drink," he said.

In the 1940s, Paul Marcucci's son took over the property and gave it "an overhaul," McKale said.

"He returned it to the family tradition of dining and entertainment," he said.

"Lots of meetings were held there. Sonoma County Board of Realtors had their annual meeting there. I have a note that says, 'They danced the night away, always vowing to return.' It was a lot of fun for a lot of people," McKale said.

The Vintage Festival Patron's Ball was also held there, according to notes in the Cochran Binders at the Preservation League's Maysonnave House.

McKale said the resort was active until the 1980s and has been vacant since then.

"The field next to it is known as Paul's Field," he said. "In 1958, the land was donated by Paul Jr. and his wife, Eve, for use by the Little League. The Valley of the Moon Little League was established there."

According to historical notes of the Preservation League, the field is leased to the Little League by Marcucci's daughter, the current owner, for $1 a year.

The now charred resort sits on 6.3 acres.

Local artist Barbara White Perry visited the site to sketch it a few years ago. Her impressions and the sketch hang on the wall at Maysonnave House. She wrote that hornets had taken over the roof.

Perry told Patch on Thursday that she was sad to hear of the resort's demise and that she was glad her work had captured a part of local history that no longer exists.

Follow Sonoma Valley Patch on Facebook and Twitter.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Sonoma Valley Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Ralph Hutchinson May 18, 2013 at 08:51 pm
I still say the People will be wise to these bush league tactics and the residents of Sonoma willRead More vote against the destruction of the Plaza and our small town feel. We won''t sell out like Napa or Healdsburg and certainly we're not like the 101 corridor.
Ralph Hutchinson May 17, 2013 at 09:38 am
Another Cuban party perhaps in the works at the Kenwood Ranch, chompin on contraband cigars, etc?Read More Grand prize trips to Cuba with Californians Building Bridges and rub elbows with fatcat Politicians? Or maybe Kings tickets?
Ralph Hutchinson May 17, 2013 at 11:37 am
What kind of conflicts of interest are present with Nancy Simpson? She is on the County Landmarks,Read More formerly affiliated with Sonoma Valley Visitors Bureau and Wendy Peterson? Are all these agencies and bureaus interlocked some receiving TOT tax revenues, and all standing to benefit from anything Darius Anderson can build?
Ralph Hutchinson May 17, 2013 at 11:32 am
Is Darius really after a casino in Sonoma either at General Vallejo State Park next to his RamekinsRead More location or up valley at Sonoma Development Center?
Ralph Hutchinson May 17, 2013 at 11:31 am
Ms. G doesn't even live in Sonoma does she? Isn't it Cloverdale? Wasn't she a big proponent of theRead More bypass in her town?
sal nero May 15, 2013 at 08:11 pm
The Sonoma Sun's website (but not SunFMTV) has been down for hours. What's happening ?
Ralph Hutchinson May 15, 2013 at 03:25 pm
Did Darius Anderso agree to buyout The Patch and have the archives and comments removed as part ofRead More this new software update? Afterall "Cows Not Casinos", Measure A Rosewood Hillside hotel, and Measure C Hospital Eminent Domain would be better if the People of Sonoma forgot all about it and let his hotel venture fly easier.
sal nero May 15, 2013 at 03:20 pm
When Bolling "lost" his comments on Sonoma Valley Bank and then the whole archive heRead More blamed a glitch yet they have never been restored. That has benefitted the Hotel Index-Tribune and allowed a cover up of key historical dates and facts. Please hurry and restore the Patch's missing blogs and comments ASAP so that the confidence the Sonoma Patch has attained is not damaged. Thanks
Ralph Hutchinson May 15, 2013 at 03:09 pm
The comments to various articles and blogs are also completely missing. Please restore asap.
Dee Baucher May 18, 2013 at 09:37 am
I write about the issue of the BRACA test, because I am someone who developed breast cancer, and whoRead More needed the test. Even though I already had breast cancer, the decision of whether to have a bilateral mastectomy (rather than just a removal of the cancer with a "lumpectomy" or the removal of only one, effected, breast) was dependent upon the results of that test. If I had a genetic marker that indicated I was likely to develop more breast cancers, there would be no reason to avoid having both breasts removed at once. Even though my doctors recognized the importance of getting this test done before surgical decisions were made, the insurance company was resistant to providing coverage for the test. There were many heated phone conversations with the insurance company, and many letters of documentation before I was finally allowed to have the test. The basic test for BRAC I and BRAC II (the 2 main genes identified) cost $3,000. However, there are even more specialized tests for the smaller BRAC genes (rare genes that are less common) that cost thousands of dollars extra, and would have been helpful because of my family history. I was not able to fight with the insurance company for permission to obtain those extra tests, since I was already weak and ill from the chemotherapy, at that time. It is not reasonable or acceptable for women to have to fight to get necessary tests performed, because of excessive charging for those tests, and resistance of the medical insurance companies to provide coverage to obtain them. This situation needs to be changed. I hope that Angelina Jolie's story will bring attention to this issue, and will help our Supreme Court to recognize the unfairness in allowing a company to lay claim on a "patent" of our genes. The main research to provide the exact mapping of our genes was provided by the "Human Genome Project", which was primarily paid for by the US taxpayers, via that extensive NIH study. The Myriad company did some further research to refine knowledge on the BRACA genes; but they should not be allowed a total patent which blocks all other US labs from performing tests on that same part of our DNA. That is unreasonable in terms of the amount of profit they are claiming, and unfair to US humans who should be able to claim ownership of their own DNA.
Dee Baucher May 18, 2013 at 08:50 am
I am not used to Hollywood-types having the type of integrity and honesty, that Ms. Jolie displayedRead More with her NY Times revelation. I commend her for having the courage to act proactively with surgical removal of her breasts, in addition to the planned removal of her ovaries. She lost her beloved mother to the disease, and she clearly understands the devastation that would befall her own children (if she were to develop the types of cancers that her genetic makeup render her vulnerable to). I agree with her decision, and hope that I would have the same strength, if confronted with the genetic evidence that she was able to have documented with the BRACA testing. Unfortunately, many women who would benefit in the same way, from advance knowledge about their genetic vulnerability to those cancers, are denied the ability to get the tests. The company that "owns" the test, by virtue of their assertion that they "own the patent" on that identified portion of our DNA, charge $3,000.00 for the test. That cost is too high for most women in the US to easily afford, and our health insurance typically refuses to cover the test for most women. There is currently a case before the US Supreme Court challenging the idea of a medical company owning our genes. Many of us are hopeful that the court will halt this company from claiming this patent, so that laboratories all over the country can provide the test to us inexpensively, and therefore it will be available to all who should have it. The costs for the type of very sophisticated plastic surgery/ breast reconstruction that Ms. Jolie underwent, are also extremely high. It is doubtful that insurance or Obamacare will provide coverage for that type of costly prophylactic surgery. Those are battles that women will need to fight in the future, when more women become informed about their personal risks and choices.