.
Feedback

Father and Son Arrested in Connection With Forestville Triple Homicides

The men in custody in New Mexico and Colorado are the second and third suspects to be arrested.

Sheriff's detectives have arrested a father and son in connection with the triple homicides in Forestville on Feb. 5. The arrested men, now in custody in New Mexico and Colorado, are the second and third suspects to be arrested. The first arrest was a Colorado man taken into custody in Alabama in February. The slayings left three men dead from gunshot wounds at a residence on Ross Station Road. The homicides were thought to be related to a drug deal gone bad, according to earlier reports by the Sheriff's Department.


Francis R. Dwyer, age 65, has been arrested at his residence in Truth or Consequences, New Mexico. He is currently in custody in New Mexico and will be extradited to Sonoma County in the near future, according to a news release. He is going to be booked for murder and a variety of other charges, according to the Sheriff's Department. The District Attorney's Office will have more information on the specific charges at a later date, it was reported.

Odin Leonard Dwyer, age 38, the son of Francis, was arrested just outside of Denver. Records show that he had previously resided in various other Colorado cities, including Golden. Odin is currently in custody in Colorado and will be extradited to Sonoma County in the near future, the Sheriff's Department reported. He is also going to be booked for murder and a variety of other charges.

The gold Ford Ranger noted in the investigation is reported to be registered to Francis Dwyer. The Sheriff's Department had earlier reported that Francis and Odin had been seen traveling with Mark Cappello, a suspect in the homicides, through Wyoming, Nevada, and into Napa County just days prior to the homicide. An investigation in Alabama, Colorado, and New Mexico led investigators to believe that all three suspects played a role in the murders of Raleigh Butler, Todd Klarkowski and Richard Lewin, the Sheriff's Department stated in the news release.

Butler, 26, was reported to be a former Petaluma resident who most recently was living in the Lake Tahoe area; Lewin, 46, was from Huntington, N.Y.;  and Todd Klarkowski, 42, was from Boulder, Colo., according to the Sheriff's Department.

Sheriff's detectives recovered evidence believed to be from the Butler residence in Forestville.

Cappello will be booked into the Sonoma County Jail within the next several days. He was arrested in Alabama on Feb. 14.

"Although we have the three suspects we believe are responsible for this homicide, this investigation is ongoing and there is still a great deal of follow up work to be done, including but not limited to further interviews of persons both in and out of the state," the news release states.

There will be a press conference at 3 p.m. this afternoon at the Sheriff's Department.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Sonoma Valley Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
sal nero May 21, 2013 at 07:58 am
Incidentally, hiding what appears to be a response to Mr. Shonbrun underneath another topic proves aRead More very cowardly act for someone who calls themselves a "Publisher and Editor" with all of the license that would imply. It only proves Mr. Shonbrun's contention that your intent is to coyly advocate for your obvious goal. Calling attention to the argument you engaged in by dedicating a headline would be to acquiesce to Shonbrun's suggestion. Not doing so by hiding your petulant answer under another headline only proves he was right.
Ralph Hutchinson May 18, 2013 at 08:51 pm
I still say the People will be wise to these bush league tactics and the residents of Sonoma willRead More vote against the destruction of the Plaza and our small town feel. We won''t sell out like Napa or Healdsburg and certainly we're not like the 101 corridor.
Ralph Hutchinson May 20, 2013 at 01:25 pm
I still say Preserving Sonoma will get way more than enough votes and present to City Council.Read More Instead of doing the right thing City Council will punt the ball and not vote to do the ballot anyway. They can save money and do the right thing but they are so far conflicted with Darius and his free gifts, campaign gift, parties and the like they are blinded. Same with Chamber of Commerce.
Ralph Hutchinson May 17, 2013 at 09:38 am
Another Cuban party perhaps in the works at the Kenwood Ranch, chompin on contraband cigars, etc?Read More Grand prize trips to Cuba with Californians Building Bridges and rub elbows with fatcat Politicians? Or maybe Kings tickets?
Ralph Hutchinson May 17, 2013 at 11:37 am
What kind of conflicts of interest are present with Nancy Simpson? She is on the County Landmarks,Read More formerly affiliated with Sonoma Valley Visitors Bureau and Wendy Peterson? Are all these agencies and bureaus interlocked some receiving TOT tax revenues, and all standing to benefit from anything Darius Anderson can build?
Ralph Hutchinson May 17, 2013 at 11:32 am
Is Darius really after a casino in Sonoma either at General Vallejo State Park next to his RamekinsRead More location or up valley at Sonoma Development Center?
Ralph Hutchinson May 17, 2013 at 11:31 am
Ms. G doesn't even live in Sonoma does she? Isn't it Cloverdale? Wasn't she a big proponent of theRead More bypass in her town?
sal nero May 15, 2013 at 08:11 pm
The Sonoma Sun's website (but not SunFMTV) has been down for hours. What's happening ?
Ralph Hutchinson May 15, 2013 at 03:25 pm
Did Darius Anderso agree to buyout The Patch and have the archives and comments removed as part ofRead More this new software update? Afterall "Cows Not Casinos", Measure A Rosewood Hillside hotel, and Measure C Hospital Eminent Domain would be better if the People of Sonoma forgot all about it and let his hotel venture fly easier.
sal nero May 15, 2013 at 03:20 pm
When Bolling "lost" his comments on Sonoma Valley Bank and then the whole archive heRead More blamed a glitch yet they have never been restored. That has benefitted the Hotel Index-Tribune and allowed a cover up of key historical dates and facts. Please hurry and restore the Patch's missing blogs and comments ASAP so that the confidence the Sonoma Patch has attained is not damaged. Thanks
Ralph Hutchinson May 15, 2013 at 03:09 pm
The comments to various articles and blogs are also completely missing. Please restore asap.
Dee Baucher May 18, 2013 at 09:37 am
I write about the issue of the BRACA test, because I am someone who developed breast cancer, and whoRead More needed the test. Even though I already had breast cancer, the decision of whether to have a bilateral mastectomy (rather than just a removal of the cancer with a "lumpectomy" or the removal of only one, effected, breast) was dependent upon the results of that test. If I had a genetic marker that indicated I was likely to develop more breast cancers, there would be no reason to avoid having both breasts removed at once. Even though my doctors recognized the importance of getting this test done before surgical decisions were made, the insurance company was resistant to providing coverage for the test. There were many heated phone conversations with the insurance company, and many letters of documentation before I was finally allowed to have the test. The basic test for BRAC I and BRAC II (the 2 main genes identified) cost $3,000. However, there are even more specialized tests for the smaller BRAC genes (rare genes that are less common) that cost thousands of dollars extra, and would have been helpful because of my family history. I was not able to fight with the insurance company for permission to obtain those extra tests, since I was already weak and ill from the chemotherapy, at that time. It is not reasonable or acceptable for women to have to fight to get necessary tests performed, because of excessive charging for those tests, and resistance of the medical insurance companies to provide coverage to obtain them. This situation needs to be changed. I hope that Angelina Jolie's story will bring attention to this issue, and will help our Supreme Court to recognize the unfairness in allowing a company to lay claim on a "patent" of our genes. The main research to provide the exact mapping of our genes was provided by the "Human Genome Project", which was primarily paid for by the US taxpayers, via that extensive NIH study. The Myriad company did some further research to refine knowledge on the BRACA genes; but they should not be allowed a total patent which blocks all other US labs from performing tests on that same part of our DNA. That is unreasonable in terms of the amount of profit they are claiming, and unfair to US humans who should be able to claim ownership of their own DNA.
Dee Baucher May 18, 2013 at 08:50 am
I am not used to Hollywood-types having the type of integrity and honesty, that Ms. Jolie displayedRead More with her NY Times revelation. I commend her for having the courage to act proactively with surgical removal of her breasts, in addition to the planned removal of her ovaries. She lost her beloved mother to the disease, and she clearly understands the devastation that would befall her own children (if she were to develop the types of cancers that her genetic makeup render her vulnerable to). I agree with her decision, and hope that I would have the same strength, if confronted with the genetic evidence that she was able to have documented with the BRACA testing. Unfortunately, many women who would benefit in the same way, from advance knowledge about their genetic vulnerability to those cancers, are denied the ability to get the tests. The company that "owns" the test, by virtue of their assertion that they "own the patent" on that identified portion of our DNA, charge $3,000.00 for the test. That cost is too high for most women in the US to easily afford, and our health insurance typically refuses to cover the test for most women. There is currently a case before the US Supreme Court challenging the idea of a medical company owning our genes. Many of us are hopeful that the court will halt this company from claiming this patent, so that laboratories all over the country can provide the test to us inexpensively, and therefore it will be available to all who should have it. The costs for the type of very sophisticated plastic surgery/ breast reconstruction that Ms. Jolie underwent, are also extremely high. It is doubtful that insurance or Obamacare will provide coverage for that type of costly prophylactic surgery. Those are battles that women will need to fight in the future, when more women become informed about their personal risks and choices.