.
Feedback

Sonoma DA Reviewing Allegations of Stun Gun Use on Patients of Sonoma Developmental Center

Former caregiver Archie Millora is accused of the the alleged incidents took place in 2011.

By Bay City News Service

The Sonoma County District Attorney's Office is reviewing new information it has received about allegations that a caregiver assaulted several patients of the Sonoma Developmental Center with a stun gun last September.

According to an article published this week by California Watch, a team of reporters with the Center for Investigative Reporting, an anonymous caller accused caregiver Archie Millora of abusing at least 11 of the severely disabled patients at the Center in Eldridge near Sonoma around Sept. 26, 2011.

Sonoma County Chief Deputy District Attorney Spencer Brady said the Sonoma Developmental Center's in-house police, the Office of Protective Services, found a loaded 40-caliber Glock handgun and a Taser stun gun in Millora's vehicle after it received the anonymous tip.

The Office of Protective Services did an administrative investigation and determined the Taser in Millora's vehicle was not the weapon that was used to inflict the wounds on the patients, Brady said.

The Sonoma County District Attorney's Office decided there was not enough evidence to charge Millora with assault after it reviewed the OPS's administrative investigation report.

"We had the OPS opinion the Taser that was located was not the weapon that was used," Brady said. "There were no witnesses and the Taser's probes did not line up with the width and distances of the wounds on the patients," Brady said.

Millora was arrested on Feb. 11 on misdemeanor charges of carrying a concealed weapon in a vehicle and carrying a loaded firearm in a public place on Sept. 27, 2011, according to Sonoma County Superior Court records.

He pleaded no contest on April 2 to carrying a concealed weapon in a vehicle. The prosecution dismissed the charge of carrying a loaded firearm in a public place, according to court records.

Millora was sentenced to three years' probation and 20 days in the Sonoma County jail. He was required to turn himself in at the North County Detention Facility on May 24 and was ordered not to own, use or possess any weapons.

Millora applied for a work release program in lieu of his 20-day jail sentence but was rejected. He then requested supervised electronic home confinement, but the court records do not state if it was approved. He paid a $190 fine imposed by the court by July 2.

After the Sonoma County District Attorney's Office decided there was no evidence to file assault charges against Millora, it received from California Watch a document that was leaked to the media by someone in the state Health and Human Services Agency, Brady said.

"They (the Health and Human Services Agency) never gave us a report. Now that we have it, we want to get to the truth of the matter," Brady said.

"We will review the entire case from a legal and factual standpoint," Brady said.

"We'll review any evidence and see what the legal issues are since he (Millora) already was charged and pled (no contest)", Brady said.

In response to the California Watch article, Sonoma County Sheriff Steve Freitas said the Office of Protective Services notified his department of the investigation in September or early October 2011. The state had its own investigators on the case, Freitas said.

"They told us they had a suspect identified but didn't need our help," he said. "We told them if anything changes to get in touch."

Follow us on Twitter

Like us on Facebook

Sign up for our daily newsletter

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Sonoma Valley Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Ralph Hutchinson May 21, 2013 at 09:40 am
Bloggers are not happy about losing all this work. This discredits AOL and Patch. The People wouldRead More have expected a more thorough conversion, well thought out and tested before implemented.
Ralph Hutchinson May 21, 2013 at 09:33 am
We need a graphic poll and it needs to stay up on the front page for a week to get a good read.Read More Things scroll down out of sight too often especially important topics. Other Patch articles seem to stay up for days. Can you lock it in this time?
Ralph Hutchinson May 21, 2013 at 09:19 am
The poll was running 70-75% the entire time it was up. It showed what is likely to happen in theRead More petition drive and for a vote should that prove necessary. I just don't see as it matters much because the People will do the right thing they wil not rely on Corrupted City Council sell-outs or Chamber of Commerce cronies.
Ralph Hutchinson May 21, 2013 at 09:28 am
Bolling is a liar, many of the grassroots effort including myself have written Letters to the IndexRead More Tribune. He declares he won't print anything I write documenting a personal bias. I know of several others. There are Letters lying on the floor and jammed into the online upload tool the Index Tribune is not running. Period. Its one-sided because they are all sell-outs and conflicted. Everybody knows it. Its absolutely hilarious when he does write like he did in today's IT burying an Op-Ed piece under some Minidoka title because it only shows his true colors and shows the rest of the Valley how deparate he really is. The more be makes his declarations, the sillier he looks. Go ahead Bolling, keep digging your hole. The whole Valley is watching and frankly, this story might get regional or National news before the election so you will be famous as a bush-league wanna be journalist of a crony operation in a corrupt town which you helped create with your newspaper.
sal nero May 21, 2013 at 09:24 am
Has ANYONE (including all partners) at the Hotel Index-Tribune taken the "NO CASINO"Read More pledge ? Nope. Not a one. Has anyone taken a "Defense of the Developmentally Disabled" pledge to keep them at SDC rather than put them into the general population? NOPE! After 35 Hotel Index-Tribune articles the reason is pretty clear isn't it ? Using the situation at SDC to gain leverage for personal profit is contemptible and SICK !
Ralph Hutchinson May 21, 2013 at 09:15 am
All sell-outs. Bought and paid for. No respect and no credibility. Cronyism. No credibleRead More journalist respects the Index Tribune and its been years and years this is just the icing on the cake, the final sell out. Disgusting conflicts of interest run rampant. Pay to Play, Corruption settlements, kickbacks in New Mexico, favors, campaign contributions, policital juckets to Cuba, redirecting side payments from clients for campaign funds...if not illegal the court of public opinion frowns on it as an unethical practice. Thats the reason laws are made to govern against unethical and improper practice for people who cannot do the right thing and govern themselves, we all have to pay the price. Always an abusive practice, always covering a loophole. I saw it my whole banking career and Politics is even dirtier and more corrupt. What an honorable way to conduct one's life, what an honorable character and set of morals to pass down to the next generation. COWS NOT CASINOS....Remember!!!!
Ralph Hutchinson May 18, 2013 at 08:51 pm
I still say the People will be wise to these bush league tactics and the residents of Sonoma willRead More vote against the destruction of the Plaza and our small town feel. We won''t sell out like Napa or Healdsburg and certainly we're not like the 101 corridor.
Ralph Hutchinson May 20, 2013 at 01:25 pm
I still say Preserving Sonoma will get way more than enough votes and present to City Council.Read More Instead of doing the right thing City Council will punt the ball and not vote to do the ballot anyway. They can save money and do the right thing but they are so far conflicted with Darius and his free gifts, campaign gift, parties and the like they are blinded. Same with Chamber of Commerce.
Ralph Hutchinson May 17, 2013 at 09:38 am
Another Cuban party perhaps in the works at the Kenwood Ranch, chompin on contraband cigars, etc?Read More Grand prize trips to Cuba with Californians Building Bridges and rub elbows with fatcat Politicians? Or maybe Kings tickets?
Ralph Hutchinson May 17, 2013 at 11:37 am
What kind of conflicts of interest are present with Nancy Simpson? She is on the County Landmarks,Read More formerly affiliated with Sonoma Valley Visitors Bureau and Wendy Peterson? Are all these agencies and bureaus interlocked some receiving TOT tax revenues, and all standing to benefit from anything Darius Anderson can build?
Ralph Hutchinson May 17, 2013 at 11:32 am
Is Darius really after a casino in Sonoma either at General Vallejo State Park next to his RamekinsRead More location or up valley at Sonoma Development Center?
Ralph Hutchinson May 17, 2013 at 11:31 am
Ms. G doesn't even live in Sonoma does she? Isn't it Cloverdale? Wasn't she a big proponent of theRead More bypass in her town?
sal nero May 15, 2013 at 08:11 pm
The Sonoma Sun's website (but not SunFMTV) has been down for hours. What's happening ?
Ralph Hutchinson May 15, 2013 at 03:25 pm
Did Darius Anderso agree to buyout The Patch and have the archives and comments removed as part ofRead More this new software update? Afterall "Cows Not Casinos", Measure A Rosewood Hillside hotel, and Measure C Hospital Eminent Domain would be better if the People of Sonoma forgot all about it and let his hotel venture fly easier.
sal nero May 15, 2013 at 03:20 pm
When Bolling "lost" his comments on Sonoma Valley Bank and then the whole archive heRead More blamed a glitch yet they have never been restored. That has benefitted the Hotel Index-Tribune and allowed a cover up of key historical dates and facts. Please hurry and restore the Patch's missing blogs and comments ASAP so that the confidence the Sonoma Patch has attained is not damaged. Thanks
Ralph Hutchinson May 15, 2013 at 03:09 pm
The comments to various articles and blogs are also completely missing. Please restore asap.
Dee Baucher May 18, 2013 at 09:37 am
I write about the issue of the BRACA test, because I am someone who developed breast cancer, and whoRead More needed the test. Even though I already had breast cancer, the decision of whether to have a bilateral mastectomy (rather than just a removal of the cancer with a "lumpectomy" or the removal of only one, effected, breast) was dependent upon the results of that test. If I had a genetic marker that indicated I was likely to develop more breast cancers, there would be no reason to avoid having both breasts removed at once. Even though my doctors recognized the importance of getting this test done before surgical decisions were made, the insurance company was resistant to providing coverage for the test. There were many heated phone conversations with the insurance company, and many letters of documentation before I was finally allowed to have the test. The basic test for BRAC I and BRAC II (the 2 main genes identified) cost $3,000. However, there are even more specialized tests for the smaller BRAC genes (rare genes that are less common) that cost thousands of dollars extra, and would have been helpful because of my family history. I was not able to fight with the insurance company for permission to obtain those extra tests, since I was already weak and ill from the chemotherapy, at that time. It is not reasonable or acceptable for women to have to fight to get necessary tests performed, because of excessive charging for those tests, and resistance of the medical insurance companies to provide coverage to obtain them. This situation needs to be changed. I hope that Angelina Jolie's story will bring attention to this issue, and will help our Supreme Court to recognize the unfairness in allowing a company to lay claim on a "patent" of our genes. The main research to provide the exact mapping of our genes was provided by the "Human Genome Project", which was primarily paid for by the US taxpayers, via that extensive NIH study. The Myriad company did some further research to refine knowledge on the BRACA genes; but they should not be allowed a total patent which blocks all other US labs from performing tests on that same part of our DNA. That is unreasonable in terms of the amount of profit they are claiming, and unfair to US humans who should be able to claim ownership of their own DNA.
Dee Baucher May 18, 2013 at 08:50 am
I am not used to Hollywood-types having the type of integrity and honesty, that Ms. Jolie displayedRead More with her NY Times revelation. I commend her for having the courage to act proactively with surgical removal of her breasts, in addition to the planned removal of her ovaries. She lost her beloved mother to the disease, and she clearly understands the devastation that would befall her own children (if she were to develop the types of cancers that her genetic makeup render her vulnerable to). I agree with her decision, and hope that I would have the same strength, if confronted with the genetic evidence that she was able to have documented with the BRACA testing. Unfortunately, many women who would benefit in the same way, from advance knowledge about their genetic vulnerability to those cancers, are denied the ability to get the tests. The company that "owns" the test, by virtue of their assertion that they "own the patent" on that identified portion of our DNA, charge $3,000.00 for the test. That cost is too high for most women in the US to easily afford, and our health insurance typically refuses to cover the test for most women. There is currently a case before the US Supreme Court challenging the idea of a medical company owning our genes. Many of us are hopeful that the court will halt this company from claiming this patent, so that laboratories all over the country can provide the test to us inexpensively, and therefore it will be available to all who should have it. The costs for the type of very sophisticated plastic surgery/ breast reconstruction that Ms. Jolie underwent, are also extremely high. It is doubtful that insurance or Obamacare will provide coverage for that type of costly prophylactic surgery. Those are battles that women will need to fight in the future, when more women become informed about their personal risks and choices.