.
Feedback

Traffic Control 'Long Overdue' as Sonoma Becomes 'More Popular'

City council hears impassioned pleas from residents, including the father of a boy recently hit on a crosswalk.

The father of a boy recently hit by a vehicle on a Sonoma crosswalk was one of many people who weighed in on traffic control at Monday night's city council meeting.

"My son was hit by a driver who didn't stop," he said. "When his friend realized at the last minute the car wasn't going to stop, he put his hand up. The 92-year-old driver said he saw people fighting on the crosswalk. It shows the confusion of his state of mind. An elderly man struck and killed someone a couple of weeks later."

The boy was one of two teens hit by a vehicle while they were crossing Fifth Street West on Oct. 27. One boy received a skull fracture.

This month, an 80-year-old Boyes Hot Springs man was charged with vehicular manslaughter in the death of a man after hitting him on a crosswalk at Fifth Street West and Studley Street.

The viability of elderly drivers was one of the issues raised several times in Monday night's public discussion of how to prevent a further increase in the growing number of accidents involving pedestrians, bicyclists and vehicles in Sonoma. West Napa Street, 5th Street West, Andrieux and Studley streets received particular attention. First Street East, near the Mission, also got a mention.

"There are a tremendous amount of near misses," a state parks spokesman said of First Street East. "It's only a matter of time before someone gets hit. Sometimes drivers aren't looking. They either don't stop or they do 'California stops,'" he said.

A Sonoma Police spokesman said, "We can enforce unsafe speed, cell phone use and those type of offenses, but things like daydreaming are out of our jurisdiction."

Among the suggestions raised by staff and the public were speed bumps, signs, LED lights, getting rid of certain bike lanes and crosswalks, and public education.

"We've gotta slow people down," one man said in an impassioned appeal to the council. "If cars go slow, people don't die."

"We have to think about who we are trying to make safe here," Mayor Joanne Sanders said. "Pedestrians are the most vulnerable. Sonoma is becoming more popular. That will bring more congestion. The topic of a roundabout in front of the Plaza needs to be discussed. It's long overdue."

She suggested that a public education outreach include senior housing.

Council members and the public mentioned late afternoon congestion getting in and out of the Safeway parking lot.

Staff will further study the options and return to the council with an update.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Sonoma Valley Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
sal nero May 23, 2013 at 01:11 pm
Yes, Bolling has signed on for the whole enchilada. After all, he even moderated the "fakeRead More concern for SDC" shenanigans at Ramekins for the Hotel Index-Tribune late last year. Their feigned outrage about the abuse was ginned up sensationalism to oust the rest of the patients. Yes, Mr. Bolling was the face of that charade with the help of Bronstein and the Sonoma Media partners. Don't those people have enough money ??? Helping to kick out the developmentally disabled is about as low as it gets !
Ralph Hutchinson May 23, 2013 at 10:03 am
Smear campaign of the Index Tribune partnering with California Watch (relying on their connectionsRead More of Bronstein and Falk former Chronicle people now partners or colleagues with Darius) and using Darius Anderson's Ramekins to host a bashing session to try to smear, embarrass, knock the SDC down and out so they can walk in and pick up the pieces to profit personally on the backs of innocent development patients. CLASS ACT Darius...you show a lot of character and compassion. But you LACK in Sonoma Valley values. Thats why your projects will not be accepted and ultimately its a rejection of you.
Ralph Hutchinson May 23, 2013 at 09:56 am
Bolling declared recently in a Sonoma VIP meeting that Darius Anderson his boss WAS in factRead More interested in developing SDC. He laughed off the idea of putting a casino at the SDC location new development but failed to realize he CONFIRMED the most important piece...that Darius DOES want to gain control of SDC and the surrounding land and develop it to profit personally. WAY TO GO BOLLING...while you were swatting the flies (laughing about the casino), we're are bagging the elephants (confirming Darius' selfish intentions to KICK OUT innocent SDC patients for $$$). We'll be watching you two.
Ralph Hutchinson May 22, 2013 at 03:43 pm
Mayor Ken Brown followed his crony Steve Page of Infineon Raceway into the fray of the Measure CRead More Hospital Eminent Domain snatch and he's following Darius Anderson Mr. "Cows Not Casinos" from his 2003 defeat. Will Ken pull out before he crashes and burns? All indications show he's stuck in the tractor beam of payoffs and gifts from The Candy Man Darius Anderson. I think we've lost him...For what is a man advantaged, if he gain the whole world, and lose himself, or be cast away?
Ralph Hutchinson May 22, 2013 at 08:49 am
Sonoma City Mayor Ken Brown. Perhaps the headline should clarify for those who aren't in tune withRead More Ken. He is famous like Madonna, Prince and others with just their first name but...he's on his way out I suspect after this blunder so close to Measure C Hospital Eminent Domain failure on the Leveroni Road Dairy Farm takeover led by his crony Steve Page of Infineon Raceway. And to think the dynamic duo are teaming up again with their new sidekick Darius Anderson who himself is 0-1 with Cows Not Casinos. What a bunch of "losers" backing causes with a snowballs chance in Hell. When will these cronies learn the People still control Sonoma Valley. We haven't all sold out to the elitists.
Ralph Hutchinson May 22, 2013 at 08:42 am
We've blogged his conflicts of interest, how many City Council or Mayors have a radio show platformRead More to dispense their agenda? Ken has Gary Magnani the American Legion Commander on the show regularly and Gary is a card carrying founding member of Protect Sonoma? Ken took Gary to the Darius party at his Kenwood Ranch for Dianne Feinstein according to Kathleen Hill's gossip column so we know Ken and Gary are "toadies" for Darius taking his gifts. Ken already said in the Press Democrat he wouldn't be supporting the Preserving Sonoma initiative in not so many words. This is a big deal in Sonoma. Bill Hammet needs a Hail Mary as owner/operator of the radio and TV stations. He is under immense pressure by the banks who already foreclosed on the real estate to make major changes to the operations. Ken Brown is a "Franchise Player" with Good Morning Sonoma and Stan Pappas and many of the others in and around the show "beholden" to him for favors and doing Ken favors in exchange for coverage and Council favors. I mean think about it, Ken was at the healm the last 7+ years and the radio has been tanking, why would you keep the guy in that took the radio station down? Gotta fire the Leadership and get a new coach. I can't figure out why the Heck you keep around somebody like that though that's gonna be bad blood infecting anything new you try a recipe for disaster. In the corporate world you cut clean. Hammet is a good guy but this is another example of his weak leadership from a business perspective. He probably felt sorry for Ken since he pays him in the neighborhood of $10,000 a year out of the Common Bond fund as disclosed on Ken's political paperwork. Not to worry, My prediction....Darius and Bolling get Ken a paid column at the Index Tribune and he becomes an official spokesman for the Hotel while sitting as Mayor. Its ok cause under the ETHICS RULES OF DARIUS....everything is peachy keen and conflicts of interest are fine as long as you line the personal pockets of your owners. Pay to Play. Cows Not Casinos.
sal nero May 21, 2013 at 01:09 pm
The UFC's owners are the Fertitta Bros., Station Casino's owners. They bought it for $1MM in 2001.Read More Station filed for bankruptcy a couple of years ago on the Casino business part of the empire wiping out shareholders. The UFC was under this other shell and the profits have continued rolling in. Yeah, yeah I know its aaaaall legal. Remember Leon Shahinian? The Calpers guy who went to Darius' house and then a MMA bout with either Darius or Kirk (he couldn't recall which)? http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/money_co/2010/08/darius-anderson-under-scope-of-calpers-pension-probe.html Birds of a feather...
Ralph Hutchinson May 21, 2013 at 11:49 am
Flights, fight tickets, rooms and food in exchange for votes? More examples of quality ethics likeRead More those practices creeping into Sonoma Valley courtesy of Darius Anderson and his Pay to Play tactics.
Ralph Hutchinson May 21, 2013 at 09:33 am
We need a graphic poll and it needs to stay up on the front page for a week to get a good read.Read More Things scroll down out of sight too often especially important topics. Other Patch articles seem to stay up for days. Can you lock it in this time?
Ralph Hutchinson May 18, 2013 at 08:51 pm
I still say the People will be wise to these bush league tactics and the residents of Sonoma willRead More vote against the destruction of the Plaza and our small town feel. We won''t sell out like Napa or Healdsburg and certainly we're not like the 101 corridor.
Ralph Hutchinson May 20, 2013 at 01:25 pm
I still say Preserving Sonoma will get way more than enough votes and present to City Council.Read More Instead of doing the right thing City Council will punt the ball and not vote to do the ballot anyway. They can save money and do the right thing but they are so far conflicted with Darius and his free gifts, campaign gift, parties and the like they are blinded. Same with Chamber of Commerce.
Ralph Hutchinson May 17, 2013 at 09:38 am
Another Cuban party perhaps in the works at the Kenwood Ranch, chompin on contraband cigars, etc?Read More Grand prize trips to Cuba with Californians Building Bridges and rub elbows with fatcat Politicians? Or maybe Kings tickets?
Ralph Hutchinson May 17, 2013 at 11:37 am
What kind of conflicts of interest are present with Nancy Simpson? She is on the County Landmarks,Read More formerly affiliated with Sonoma Valley Visitors Bureau and Wendy Peterson? Are all these agencies and bureaus interlocked some receiving TOT tax revenues, and all standing to benefit from anything Darius Anderson can build?
Ralph Hutchinson May 17, 2013 at 11:32 am
Is Darius really after a casino in Sonoma either at General Vallejo State Park next to his RamekinsRead More location or up valley at Sonoma Development Center?
Ralph Hutchinson May 17, 2013 at 11:31 am
Ms. G doesn't even live in Sonoma does she? Isn't it Cloverdale? Wasn't she a big proponent of theRead More bypass in her town?
sal nero May 15, 2013 at 08:11 pm
The Sonoma Sun's website (but not SunFMTV) has been down for hours. What's happening ?
Ralph Hutchinson May 15, 2013 at 03:25 pm
Did Darius Anderso agree to buyout The Patch and have the archives and comments removed as part ofRead More this new software update? Afterall "Cows Not Casinos", Measure A Rosewood Hillside hotel, and Measure C Hospital Eminent Domain would be better if the People of Sonoma forgot all about it and let his hotel venture fly easier.
sal nero May 15, 2013 at 03:20 pm
When Bolling "lost" his comments on Sonoma Valley Bank and then the whole archive heRead More blamed a glitch yet they have never been restored. That has benefitted the Hotel Index-Tribune and allowed a cover up of key historical dates and facts. Please hurry and restore the Patch's missing blogs and comments ASAP so that the confidence the Sonoma Patch has attained is not damaged. Thanks
Ralph Hutchinson May 15, 2013 at 03:09 pm
The comments to various articles and blogs are also completely missing. Please restore asap.
Dee Baucher May 18, 2013 at 09:37 am
I write about the issue of the BRACA test, because I am someone who developed breast cancer, and whoRead More needed the test. Even though I already had breast cancer, the decision of whether to have a bilateral mastectomy (rather than just a removal of the cancer with a "lumpectomy" or the removal of only one, effected, breast) was dependent upon the results of that test. If I had a genetic marker that indicated I was likely to develop more breast cancers, there would be no reason to avoid having both breasts removed at once. Even though my doctors recognized the importance of getting this test done before surgical decisions were made, the insurance company was resistant to providing coverage for the test. There were many heated phone conversations with the insurance company, and many letters of documentation before I was finally allowed to have the test. The basic test for BRAC I and BRAC II (the 2 main genes identified) cost $3,000. However, there are even more specialized tests for the smaller BRAC genes (rare genes that are less common) that cost thousands of dollars extra, and would have been helpful because of my family history. I was not able to fight with the insurance company for permission to obtain those extra tests, since I was already weak and ill from the chemotherapy, at that time. It is not reasonable or acceptable for women to have to fight to get necessary tests performed, because of excessive charging for those tests, and resistance of the medical insurance companies to provide coverage to obtain them. This situation needs to be changed. I hope that Angelina Jolie's story will bring attention to this issue, and will help our Supreme Court to recognize the unfairness in allowing a company to lay claim on a "patent" of our genes. The main research to provide the exact mapping of our genes was provided by the "Human Genome Project", which was primarily paid for by the US taxpayers, via that extensive NIH study. The Myriad company did some further research to refine knowledge on the BRACA genes; but they should not be allowed a total patent which blocks all other US labs from performing tests on that same part of our DNA. That is unreasonable in terms of the amount of profit they are claiming, and unfair to US humans who should be able to claim ownership of their own DNA.
Dee Baucher May 18, 2013 at 08:50 am
I am not used to Hollywood-types having the type of integrity and honesty, that Ms. Jolie displayedRead More with her NY Times revelation. I commend her for having the courage to act proactively with surgical removal of her breasts, in addition to the planned removal of her ovaries. She lost her beloved mother to the disease, and she clearly understands the devastation that would befall her own children (if she were to develop the types of cancers that her genetic makeup render her vulnerable to). I agree with her decision, and hope that I would have the same strength, if confronted with the genetic evidence that she was able to have documented with the BRACA testing. Unfortunately, many women who would benefit in the same way, from advance knowledge about their genetic vulnerability to those cancers, are denied the ability to get the tests. The company that "owns" the test, by virtue of their assertion that they "own the patent" on that identified portion of our DNA, charge $3,000.00 for the test. That cost is too high for most women in the US to easily afford, and our health insurance typically refuses to cover the test for most women. There is currently a case before the US Supreme Court challenging the idea of a medical company owning our genes. Many of us are hopeful that the court will halt this company from claiming this patent, so that laboratories all over the country can provide the test to us inexpensively, and therefore it will be available to all who should have it. The costs for the type of very sophisticated plastic surgery/ breast reconstruction that Ms. Jolie underwent, are also extremely high. It is doubtful that insurance or Obamacare will provide coverage for that type of costly prophylactic surgery. Those are battles that women will need to fight in the future, when more women become informed about their personal risks and choices.