.
Feedback

DDS Voluntarily Decertifies Four Units at Sonoma Developmental Center

Problems are more significant at Corcoran, Lathrop, Bemis and Smith, the Department of Developmental Services states in a letter to Centers for Medicaid and Medicare.

The Department of Developmental Services (DDS) informed the Centers for Medicaid and Medicare (CMS) Friday that due to ongoing deficiencies at Sonoma Developmental Center (SDC) Intermediate Care Facility (ICF), the department is voluntarily withdrawing four living units from federal certification effective immediately.

The withdrawal will allow SDC to maintain certification and receive federal funding for the remaining residences, according to a news release. The action is in response to a federal notice in December from CMS that initiated a decertification action for this program at Sonoma.

SDC has two current government actions under way: the federal certification issue and the state licensing action.

"Today, DDS withdrew its appeal of the federal certification of the ICF-DD while we work on the issues at SDC," Nancy Lungren, assistant director for communications, told Patch by email.

"Our appeal with the state Department of Public Health is still in place regarding the state licensing action," she said.

In December, Department of Health threatened to revoke the primary license of the facility, after allegations of abuse of 12 patients there in 2011. Reports included rape that allegedly led to a pregnancy, reported use of a taser gun on residents and inadequate or non-existent investigation of abuse cases by the on-site police agency at the facility.

 “The well-being of our residents at Sonoma Developmental Center (SDC) is a top priority and the department has made critical improvements in the ICF, but significant work still needs to be done,” DDS Director Terri Delgadillo stated in the news release. “The department is committed to correcting the problems on all ICF living units and will expeditiously pursue recertification of the four residences as the reforms are implemented.”

DDS has already made numerous changes in the leadership and culture at SDC, she said. Both the Executive Director and the Clinical Director at SDC have been removed.

DDS has launched a nationwide search for a new Executive Director. Several other employees have been terminated or disciplined and investigations continue which could result in additional actions, the news release states.

In addition to these steps, DDS has hired additional direct care staff and has established a Corrective Action and Quality Assurance Team, consisting of state and national experts, who have been reviewing the entire SDC system to implement immediate and ongoing improvements.

The Office of Protective Services continues to undergo substantial changes, including the appointment of an interim commander on loan from the California Highway Patrol to help foster the necessary staff and skills for an effective law enforcement department, according to the news release.

Patch asked why the interim commander is one with Highway Patrol background rather than experience investigating sexual crimes.

"The Acting OPS Commander, Assistant Chief Frank Parrish, has many years of experience in law enforcement investigations," Lungren responded.

DDS has engaged an external consultant who is a nationally-recognized expert and trainer in regulatory compliance for Intermediate Care Facility/ Developmental Disability programs to conduct onsite monitoring of the changes at the facility and provide immediate feedback to DDS management, facility management and staff regarding areas of concern, the news release stated.

Frequent unannounced onsite reviews, focused mock surveys, additional reporting requirements, and the provision of technical assistance and training are also key components of the plan of correction.

Delgadillo said DDS will continue to work with state and federal partners on long-term solutions to regain certification.

“We will continue to work with families, the Legislature, staff and their union representatives on further actions that will be taken to ensure that residents are receiving the care they deserve.”

The DDS letter to the Centers for Medicaid and Medicare Services appears below.

###

January 17, 2013

James R. Farris, M.D.

Consortium Administrator

Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services

Dallas Regional Office

1301 Young Street, Room 714

Dallas, TX  75202

 

Dear Dr. Farris:

The Sonoma Developmental Center Intermediate Care Facility-Developmental Disabilities (ICF-DD) consists of ten currently occupied residential units.  They are known as:  Malone, Cohen, Poppe, Stoneman, Roadruck, Bently, Corcoran, Lathrop, Bemis, and Smith.  There are also four other residential units at the facility that are currently unoccupied.  They are:  Brent, Lux, Judah and Osbourne.

While there are deficiencies in the management, training, and staffing in the Sonoma ICF–DD units generally, the problems are more significant in Corcoran, Lathrop, Bemis and Smith.  The Department of Developmental Services (DDS) is committed to fixing the problems in all of the units, but addressing the problems in these four units will take additional time.  Therefore, DDS is amending the Medicaid Provider Agreement to discontinue Medicaid certification for these four units at the Sonoma Developmental Center.  These units currently serve 112 of the 290 residents at Sonoma. 

Enclosed is an amendment to the California Medicaid Provider Agreement confirming the deletion of the four units from certification.  A detailed Performance Improvement Plan (PIP) will be implemented that will apply to the residential units at the ICF-DD remaining under Medicaid certification.  The four non-certified units will be required to meet all the same requirements as those covered by the PIP in order to put them in a position to regain certification at a later date.  The PIP will be developed in consultation with, and subject to approval and monitoring by, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) and the California Department of Public Health (CDPH).

The amendment to the state provider agreement and the planned correction of deficiencies is intended to promote the best interests of the residents by bringing the entire Sonoma ICF-DD into compliance with Medicaid and State requirements.  As a consequence of the removal of the four residential units from the provider agreement, 178 beds within the remaining residential units will continue to be certified for federal financial participation in the operation of the ICF-DD.  DDS will not seek to increase the 178 certified bed level, unless either:  (a) CMS and the State Survey Agency (CDPH) approve such changes to the Medicaid provider agreement in advance; or (b) on the basis of the findings from a full revisit survey, CDPH certifies and CMS determines that the facility is in substantial compliance with applicable Medicaid certification requirements.

The decision to proceed with a Performance Improvement Plan covering the certified residential units and voluntarily removing from certification the other four units eliminates the need to proceed with the formal appeal of the December 12, 2012, notice of intent to decertify the entire Sonoma ICF-DD facility.  Accordingly, enclosed is a withdrawal of the DDS’ December 2012 appeal.  It is further understood that should satisfactory progress not be made under the PIP and certification of any or all of the certified residential units were to be terminated, DDS would have the right to a new appeal.

We recognize and accept that the recertification of the four non-certified units may take longer than the completion of the Performance Improvement Plan for the six certified units.  As to the four non-certified units, recertification will not start until CDPH and CMS are in agreement that the systemic deficiencies appear to have been corrected.  A recertification request will then be processed as an application to amend the existing provider agreement to increase the number of certified beds under the provider agreement and thereby restore Medicaid coverage for the specified unit(s) provided that during the period when the subject unit(s) were not Medicaid certified, such unit(s) were not converted to an alternative use that did not include services to individuals with developmental disabilities.  DDS further recognizes and accepts as a condition to restoration to the existing Medicaid provider agreement that each and every such unit will be subject to reasonable assurance requirements, including, but not limited to, demonstrating the ability to maintain compliance, as verified through onsite surveys at the beginning of 90 consecutive days.

The Department of Developmental Services is committed to bringing the Sonoma Developmental Center ICF into full compliance with both state licensing and Medicaid Certification requirements as soon as possible.

Sincerely,

Terri Delgadillo, Director

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Sonoma Valley Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
sal nero May 21, 2013 at 04:18 pm
Bolling said "two other Op-Eds were written buy the City Manager and are non-partisan..."Read More I have to know David .... Who's your dealer cuz you're smoking the good stuff ! Don't you see what you are doing to your credibility ? Well, nevermind that because you lost it sometime ago but this is EMBARRASSING man !
sal nero May 21, 2013 at 03:47 pm
I love Larry's response in the above I-T link's comments. He illustrates how a cute turn of a phraseRead More by Bolling here and there add up to journalistic bias and an effort to shade reality. Did I say shade because I meant lie so much as to ape Charles Foster Kane (Citizen Kane) ! The Hotel Index-Tribune. Yellow Journalism for the modern age.
Ralph Hutchinson May 21, 2013 at 09:28 am
Bolling is a liar, many of the grassroots effort including myself have written Letters to the IndexRead More Tribune. He declares he won't print anything I write documenting a personal bias. I know of several others. There are Letters lying on the floor and jammed into the online upload tool the Index Tribune is not running. Period. Its one-sided because they are all sell-outs and conflicted. Everybody knows it. Its absolutely hilarious when he does write like he did in today's IT burying an Op-Ed piece under some Minidoka title because it only shows his true colors and shows the rest of the Valley how deparate he really is. The more be makes his declarations, the sillier he looks. Go ahead Bolling, keep digging your hole. The whole Valley is watching and frankly, this story might get regional or National news before the election so you will be famous as a bush-league wanna be journalist of a crony operation in a corrupt town which you helped create with your newspaper.
sal nero May 21, 2013 at 01:09 pm
The UFC's owners are the Fertitta Bros., Station Casino's owners. They bought it for $1MM in 2001.Read More Station filed for bankruptcy a couple of years ago on the Casino business part of the empire wiping out shareholders. The UFC was under this other shell and the profits have continued rolling in. Yeah, yeah I know its aaaaall legal. Remember Leon Shahinian? The Calpers guy who went to Darius' house and then a MMA bout with either Darius or Kirk (he couldn't recall which)? http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/money_co/2010/08/darius-anderson-under-scope-of-calpers-pension-probe.html Birds of a feather...
Ralph Hutchinson May 21, 2013 at 11:49 am
Flights, fight tickets, rooms and food in exchange for votes? More examples of quality ethics likeRead More those practices creeping into Sonoma Valley courtesy of Darius Anderson and his Pay to Play tactics.
Ralph Hutchinson May 21, 2013 at 09:33 am
We need a graphic poll and it needs to stay up on the front page for a week to get a good read.Read More Things scroll down out of sight too often especially important topics. Other Patch articles seem to stay up for days. Can you lock it in this time?
Ralph Hutchinson May 18, 2013 at 08:51 pm
I still say the People will be wise to these bush league tactics and the residents of Sonoma willRead More vote against the destruction of the Plaza and our small town feel. We won''t sell out like Napa or Healdsburg and certainly we're not like the 101 corridor.
Ralph Hutchinson May 20, 2013 at 01:25 pm
I still say Preserving Sonoma will get way more than enough votes and present to City Council.Read More Instead of doing the right thing City Council will punt the ball and not vote to do the ballot anyway. They can save money and do the right thing but they are so far conflicted with Darius and his free gifts, campaign gift, parties and the like they are blinded. Same with Chamber of Commerce.
Ralph Hutchinson May 17, 2013 at 09:38 am
Another Cuban party perhaps in the works at the Kenwood Ranch, chompin on contraband cigars, etc?Read More Grand prize trips to Cuba with Californians Building Bridges and rub elbows with fatcat Politicians? Or maybe Kings tickets?
Ralph Hutchinson May 17, 2013 at 11:37 am
What kind of conflicts of interest are present with Nancy Simpson? She is on the County Landmarks,Read More formerly affiliated with Sonoma Valley Visitors Bureau and Wendy Peterson? Are all these agencies and bureaus interlocked some receiving TOT tax revenues, and all standing to benefit from anything Darius Anderson can build?
Ralph Hutchinson May 17, 2013 at 11:32 am
Is Darius really after a casino in Sonoma either at General Vallejo State Park next to his RamekinsRead More location or up valley at Sonoma Development Center?
Ralph Hutchinson May 17, 2013 at 11:31 am
Ms. G doesn't even live in Sonoma does she? Isn't it Cloverdale? Wasn't she a big proponent of theRead More bypass in her town?
sal nero May 15, 2013 at 08:11 pm
The Sonoma Sun's website (but not SunFMTV) has been down for hours. What's happening ?
Ralph Hutchinson May 15, 2013 at 03:25 pm
Did Darius Anderso agree to buyout The Patch and have the archives and comments removed as part ofRead More this new software update? Afterall "Cows Not Casinos", Measure A Rosewood Hillside hotel, and Measure C Hospital Eminent Domain would be better if the People of Sonoma forgot all about it and let his hotel venture fly easier.
sal nero May 15, 2013 at 03:20 pm
When Bolling "lost" his comments on Sonoma Valley Bank and then the whole archive heRead More blamed a glitch yet they have never been restored. That has benefitted the Hotel Index-Tribune and allowed a cover up of key historical dates and facts. Please hurry and restore the Patch's missing blogs and comments ASAP so that the confidence the Sonoma Patch has attained is not damaged. Thanks
Ralph Hutchinson May 15, 2013 at 03:09 pm
The comments to various articles and blogs are also completely missing. Please restore asap.
Dee Baucher May 18, 2013 at 09:37 am
I write about the issue of the BRACA test, because I am someone who developed breast cancer, and whoRead More needed the test. Even though I already had breast cancer, the decision of whether to have a bilateral mastectomy (rather than just a removal of the cancer with a "lumpectomy" or the removal of only one, effected, breast) was dependent upon the results of that test. If I had a genetic marker that indicated I was likely to develop more breast cancers, there would be no reason to avoid having both breasts removed at once. Even though my doctors recognized the importance of getting this test done before surgical decisions were made, the insurance company was resistant to providing coverage for the test. There were many heated phone conversations with the insurance company, and many letters of documentation before I was finally allowed to have the test. The basic test for BRAC I and BRAC II (the 2 main genes identified) cost $3,000. However, there are even more specialized tests for the smaller BRAC genes (rare genes that are less common) that cost thousands of dollars extra, and would have been helpful because of my family history. I was not able to fight with the insurance company for permission to obtain those extra tests, since I was already weak and ill from the chemotherapy, at that time. It is not reasonable or acceptable for women to have to fight to get necessary tests performed, because of excessive charging for those tests, and resistance of the medical insurance companies to provide coverage to obtain them. This situation needs to be changed. I hope that Angelina Jolie's story will bring attention to this issue, and will help our Supreme Court to recognize the unfairness in allowing a company to lay claim on a "patent" of our genes. The main research to provide the exact mapping of our genes was provided by the "Human Genome Project", which was primarily paid for by the US taxpayers, via that extensive NIH study. The Myriad company did some further research to refine knowledge on the BRACA genes; but they should not be allowed a total patent which blocks all other US labs from performing tests on that same part of our DNA. That is unreasonable in terms of the amount of profit they are claiming, and unfair to US humans who should be able to claim ownership of their own DNA.
Dee Baucher May 18, 2013 at 08:50 am
I am not used to Hollywood-types having the type of integrity and honesty, that Ms. Jolie displayedRead More with her NY Times revelation. I commend her for having the courage to act proactively with surgical removal of her breasts, in addition to the planned removal of her ovaries. She lost her beloved mother to the disease, and she clearly understands the devastation that would befall her own children (if she were to develop the types of cancers that her genetic makeup render her vulnerable to). I agree with her decision, and hope that I would have the same strength, if confronted with the genetic evidence that she was able to have documented with the BRACA testing. Unfortunately, many women who would benefit in the same way, from advance knowledge about their genetic vulnerability to those cancers, are denied the ability to get the tests. The company that "owns" the test, by virtue of their assertion that they "own the patent" on that identified portion of our DNA, charge $3,000.00 for the test. That cost is too high for most women in the US to easily afford, and our health insurance typically refuses to cover the test for most women. There is currently a case before the US Supreme Court challenging the idea of a medical company owning our genes. Many of us are hopeful that the court will halt this company from claiming this patent, so that laboratories all over the country can provide the test to us inexpensively, and therefore it will be available to all who should have it. The costs for the type of very sophisticated plastic surgery/ breast reconstruction that Ms. Jolie underwent, are also extremely high. It is doubtful that insurance or Obamacare will provide coverage for that type of costly prophylactic surgery. Those are battles that women will need to fight in the future, when more women become informed about their personal risks and choices.