.
Feedback

Local Group Vows to Gather Sonoma Chateau Hotel Opposition Signatures

During tonight's meeting of the Sonoma City Council, former Sonoma Mayor Larry Barnett put the council on notice.

A local group called Preserving Sonoma has put the Sonoma City Council on notice.

The message came via the public comments section of the Sonoma City Council meeting held Monday night. Former Sonoma Mayor and local writer Larry Barnett told the council that the group intended to circulate a petition to place an initiative that will amend the General Plan as it pertains to hotel development.

The group will seek to stop the development of hotels larger than 25 rooms until the annual occupancy rate in Sonoma reaches 80 percent. As of 2012, the annual occupancy rate in Sonoma stood at 64.8 percent, he told the council.

Should the group be successful in gathering enough signatures, and eventually winning in the ballots, it would stop the development of the Chateau Sonoma Hotel Project, that has been the talk of the pages of Sonoma Valley Patch as of late.

The project, on West Napa Street, is designed to feature a 59-unit hotel, a gym and an event facility, two restaurants and 2,800 square feet of retail space.

Barnett told the council that Preserving Sonoma is dedicated to "Preserving our small town character."

Do you agree? Will you be signing Preserving Sonoma's petition?

Follow us on Twitter | Like us on Facebook | Sign up for our daily newsletter

Ralph Hutchinson March 19, 2013 at 01:38 am
Patch beats the other papers to the story. Wonder if Lynch and Bolling will report it anyway since the "Boss" (Darius) put a muzzle on them and won't like to be the story despite the fact he says he wants to win awards and claims "if he's the story then so be it." (Press Democrat article).
Agree with Larry Barnett and Preserving Sonoma. Go for it get the petition now and make a change forever and end this madness. Take the power out of CIty Council's hands and put it in the hands of The People so they can never be swayed by big money, hillside hotels, eminent domain on greenspace, etc. ever again. Let Darius go buy the Sonoma Mission Inn and build out The Springs. Far better project to help revitalize Sonoma Valley and help the people. Ahhhh the grassroots is taking the City back again and standing up. Gee I didn't see that coming. Fight the Power!
Karen Kay March 19, 2013 at 05:15 am
Larry Barnett: thank you for spearheading a public opposition petition for one of the most important issues or deceitful plots ever perpetrated upon the people of Sonoma. Our history means a lot to me, looking down from my Mortgage/Insurance office window at the Bear Flag statue for 15 years always made me feel my roots here in Sonoma...until Darius Anderson's buddy Ed Haury caused me to lose my office in a fraudulent real estate scam involving Nicholas Turkey Facility (Haury), The Bank of Marin building (Haury-Cohn-Darius Anderson), The Santa Rosa Executive Center (Haury- Cohn) (see Sonoma County Superior Court records). The "Postage Stamp Lot" Darius just "stole" from the bank (Haury). Darius bought The Bank of Marin (Haury-Cohn) for $1,200,000. less than the value with a good lease. Where's our posse to run him out of town? I'm riding with you! A $10,000,000. man (Haury) files CH. 11 BK (see Santa Rosa Federal court records) and the only people to benefit were Haury & Darius Anderson.
Red Flag!
Ralph Hutchinson March 19, 2013 at 09:42 am
Ironic Haury was said to be tight with Darius. Haury's firm was business partners with Bijian Madjlessi the largest borrower at Sonoma Valley Bank who defaulted and brought the bank down. Darius benefitted on the postage stamp lot and again when Haury finally bankrupt and he bought the Bank of Marin building.
The Nicholas Turkey building was bought from Robert Nicholas Chairman of Sonoma Valley Bank an Insider Deal and financed by SVB as was the postage stamp and Bank of Marin building. Darius bought 2 Suzanne Brangham buildings (Ramekins and Generals Daughter) Suzanne owner of Saddles and MacArthur Place and the former Secretary and Director of Sonoma Valley Bank on the loan committee voting for all these deals as did Nicholas. Darius, Haury, Madjlessi, Brangham and Nicholas...just what kind of "ring" do we have snaking around here in Sonoma? What were these relationships and what was going on?
Ralph Hutchinson March 19, 2013 at 10:48 am
Sonomans don't judge a man's character by the size of his wallet. "Pay to Play" politics might work elsewhere but not in The Valley of the Moon.
Corruption charges for kickbacks in New Mexico still active cases as of year end and a settlement in New York of $500k for Darius Anderson's Platinum firm and another $550k settlement for his attorney partner. Remember "Cows Not Casinos" when Darius tried to force a casino into Sonoma Valley and now a French hotel. Does he just not understand where he moved? Is he that ignorant or is it ego and arrogance? Developers usually research the market character before they launch. Then again, in my opinion Darius doesn't demonstrate development skills...just a "yes man" front for big Vegas Casino people. CASINO: "I want one here"...DARIUS: "yes sir I know who to pay." In my opinion there is a distinct pattern and practice. These values don't match those of Sonoma.
Willi schnitzer March 19, 2013 at 11:45 am
I fell in love with the old Sonoma !
Ralph Hutchinson March 19, 2013 at 01:14 pm
Index Tribune publishes nothing but "puppy dogs and lollipops, burgers and lemon Cokes" once again the biggest story in Sonoma Valley and Bolling and Lynch are hearing nothing but crickets chirping in the Tuesday edition...covering for their crony and owner in this case. They have an online page, they can change the story and get it out but they CHOOSE not to REPORT.
The Patch leads with boots on the ground in the City Council meeting last night and active bloggers and commenters, the Sun will come out Thursday with solid coverage and good Letters to the Editor I'm confident, and the Index Tribune will have no news to cover by Friday. Something is wrong with that business model over there in my opinion, several things. Its just lost the status of the Newspaper of Record because THEY DELETED ALL THE ONLINE ARCHIVES in the wake of the Sonoma Valley Bank cover-up. I SAY BOYCOTT DARIUS ANDERSON and the INDEX TRIBUNE and PRESS DEMOCRAT send your advertising dollars over to The Patch and the Sun who bring Sonoma Valley truthful, open and honest news, hard hitting and relevent. SIGN THE PETITION, blog and comment, write letters to the editors, picket, talk it up at the coffee shops around town, and vote with your dollars as well. VIVA SONOMA!
Ralph Hutchinson March 19, 2013 at 01:18 pm
The Federated Indians of Graton Rancheria promised not to do casinos when their application was fast tracked by Barbara Boxer (who attended Darius Anderson's wedding according to his boasting in SonomaBiz magazine) while Darius partnered with Boxer's son Doug to buy the land at Route 37@Lakeville Road that led to "Cows Not Casinos."
In my opinion given the characters Darius runs with and his prior record for "Pay to Play" and corruption charges, I'm not sure I would trust anything he promised anyway.
Keith Hughes March 19, 2013 at 02:01 pm
I think preserving the small town feel for Sonoma is very important and limiting
new development with guidelines is a good idea. But the petition tied to current occupancy levels only insures that the existing hotels who are not at high occupancy levels due to below average accommodations will keep the ratio too low and therefore discourage new hotels that will add to our community's future and retain our unique small town feel.
Larry Barnett March 19, 2013 at 02:31 pm
I see most comments, as well as the headline of this article, focus on the Chateau Sonoma proposal, but I want to point out that the effort of this initiative goes well beyond that specific proposal to address the risk of rampant large hotel development within the city limits. This initiative will regulate ANY new proposed hotel in Sonoma with over 25 rooms, and others are in discussion by investors right now, including one at the location of Sonoma Truck and Auto at MacArthur and Broadway. Ours is a comprehensive approach meant to help avoid battle after battle as each new hotel is proposed.
Christian Kallen March 19, 2013 at 02:37 pm
Good point, Larry - let's address the larger issue, and not get too focused on the case at hand.
Ralph Hutchinson March 19, 2013 at 03:45 pm
Another hotel at the old car dealership Brodway @ MacArthur? What proposals are in the works? Across from Suzanne Brangham's MacArthur Hotel.
Agreed its not specific to one hotel its for Sonoma's future.
Ralph Hutchinson March 19, 2013 at 03:55 pm
Christian, the headline here says "Local Group Vows to Gather Sonoma Chateau Hotel Opposition Signatures" so the case at hand is Chateau Sonoma. If the efforts of Preserve Sonoma are geared to the issue at hand and longer term future then so be it.
At the City Council council meeting, and I quote, "Former Sonoma Mayor and local writer Larry Barnett told the council that the group intended to circulate a petition to place an initiative that will amend the General Plan as it pertains to hotel development." The article above goes on to say, as I am quite familiar with the recent talk of the recent pages of the Patch..."Should the group be successful in gathering enough signatures, and eventually winning in the ballots, it would stop the development of the Chateau Sonoma Hotel Project, that has been the talk of the pages of Sonoma Valley Patch as of late." So you see Christian, the Preserve Sonoma intiative is born of the Darius Anderson Chateau Sonoma project and designed to have an "eternal" aspect to protect against future hotel proposals from Darius or anyone else that may try to dabble in hotels going forward. Case at hand, issue at hand....its all pertinent in my opinion.
Dee Baucher March 19, 2013 at 04:31 pm
..."existing hotels who are not at high occupancy levels due to below average accommodations..." This is totally fraudulent. The existing hotels have good accommodations and appropriate rates for a place like Sonoma. The economy and tourist trade does not support more hotel rooms here. The "if we built it they will come" mentality is predicated upon hype and greed. Common sense needs to prevail. Our community will not benefit from more empty hotel rooms, excess congestion, and the types of massive over-exposure and promotion that would be necessary for investors to glean profit from a large hotel/tourist mecca in the center of town. This self-serving idea needs to be halted now. Those who are actively promoting this boondoggle need to be exposed for their personal agendas.
Christian Kallen March 19, 2013 at 04:58 pm
Interested citizens should go to the city council and other public meetings rather than rely on media to fill the void, don't you think?
Ralph Hutchinson March 19, 2013 at 05:08 pm
Interested citizens schedules don't always lend themselves to attend but Sonoma City Council meetings are in general widely attended far more than in the pews and standing in the lobby and out onto the sidewalks than most communities.
Patch Editor Alexis used to cover them reeltime as they unfolded and push out updates to email users several times during a session that's how important these meeting are to Sonoma and were at least one time to The Patch. The SunTV channel used to stream them and the Sun archive live video so all citizens could "attend" virtually. I really don't see your points Christian? Are you saying The Patch is about to pull the plug on City Counsel coverage now and be damned the out of town working and travelling people? Thank God for Carlos updating us all at about 7:40p last night he provides an important service to Sonoma Valley and other interested parties on the road.
Ralph Hutchinson March 19, 2013 at 06:37 pm
More background information on Darius Anderson available in this earlier blog
Link ---> http://sonomavalley.patch.com/blog_posts/cows-not-casinos-was-darius-anderson-remember-9878e2b7
Ralph Hutchinson March 19, 2013 at 09:25 pm
Katherine Krauss and Andrea Potts commented on Facebook SVPatch in support of The Andersons and that the hotel would be an asset to Sonoma. Perhaps they would share some details and support their opinions?
Ralph Hutchinson March 20, 2013 at 03:36 am
Preserving Sonoma has a website you can visit on the link below. Here are a list of founding member supporters. I added my name to the list tonight.
Larry Barnett Ed Clay Georgia Kelly Will Shonbrun Jerry Bernhaut Bob Edwards Marilyn Goode Kathleen Parks Perry Stanley Cohen Norma Barnett Helen Marsh Tom Cannard Mark Dennis Jeri Lynn Chandler Michael Lockert Tom Whitworth Ditty Vella Robert Berner Jamie Marsh Ralph Scott Peter Hassen Ned Forrest Jane Zimmerman Brian Ruff Hillary Wicht Bob Mosher Leslie Whitelaw Jenny Germaine Kathleen Barnett Dwayne Aslaksen Juna Carle Eleanor Cuevas Eric Baumgartner Link ---> http://www.preservingsonoma.com/index.php
Ralph Hutchinson March 21, 2013 at 11:09 am
Sonoma Development Center a future Darius casino-hotel?
Well his news cronies hosted a "horror film" highlighting abuse of mental patients at his very own Ramekins to smear the SDC and dramatize some "allegations" then proceeded to show clips from the State system not Sonoma. So where are the criminal charges? Who committed these acts? Is this all a plot for Darius Anderson to have his buddy Gov Jerry Brown close the SDC so he can buy and develop it? Brown's administration put in "The Closer" a recycled party line Administrator set to take over April Fools Day. Did the Index Tribune's Dave Bolling poo poo the crowds and over-demonize the situation? Falk and his Chronicle crony from California Watch helping to spin? In my opinion, perhaps Chateau Sonoma is a stepping stone to a bigger development at Sonoma Development Center? Something is unusual about this.
Ralph Hutchinson March 21, 2013 at 09:35 pm
Oh boy...Hillside Preservation Alliance the group that rose up and defeated the Rosewood hillside group on Measure A is poised to attack on Darius Anderson.
Now the big guns are coming out. Stand by...I think Darius just woke a sleeping giant in the People of Sonoma.
Ralph Hutchinson March 21, 2013 at 10:37 pm
Darius pleaded to "wait until the revised plans come out, we will address most of the concerns" and asked The Valley to "hold judgement."
In my opinion The People have already voted in opposition with all the fury of a Perfect Storm with Preserving Sonoma, Hillside Preservation Alliance and the Cows Not Casinos groups coming out for a reunion of sorts. For a Scotsman, Darius certainly did underestimate the power of uniting the Clans in Sonoma. Is that blue warpaint I see on The People?
Ben Boyce April 1, 2013 at 07:35 am
It's interesting how often this character Hutchison changes his story. I remember just a few days ago he was issuing his McCarthyite list of local people who were "tied" to big casino money by virtue of attending political fund-raisers.
Ralph Hutchinson 10:54 am on Tuesday, March 26, 2013 "Laurie Gallian held a Sonoma Soirée fundraiser with Susan Gorin and Facebook lists the details. Other names on there are Hosts: Steve Barbose, Donna Lewis, Larry Barnett, SUSAN MOORE, Georgia Kelly. Does that mean all these Sonoma Valley people are Casino Backers since they are partnering with Gorin and Susan Moore President of "Friends of Federated Indians of Graton Rancheria" backed by Darius Anderson and his casino interests?" What a laugher! This man has no credibility. It turns out that Larry Barnett and Georgia Kelly are key leaders in the opposition to Darius Anderson's hotel project. The accusations and innuendos are flung about carelessly. Folks, do not listen to this man. His tenure as the bully troll on Sonoma Patch is over. He will get called out on his reckless and baseless slanders. A man has to exercise some responsibility in his public statements if he expects to be respected.
Ralph Hutchinson April 1, 2013 at 09:32 am
FACT: Susan Moore was a cash donor to Gorin and raised $ for Gallian. Susan Moore and her friends were sponsors of the Susan Gorin-Laurie Gallian campaign fundraier Soire. That means those two derived financial benefit from Moore and her friends and the Casino sympathizer group she heads called "Friends of Federated Indians of Graton Rancheria."
Barbose was a host alongside Susan Moore so he in my opinion must be friendly to Casino backers to associate closely with her for a common cause. My point there appears to be conflicts of interest established and when it comes to a vote or time to take a position these sitting Politicians may NOT be able to excercise independent votes and represent the voice of the People given their loyalties whether financial or emotional. Cronyism and taking payments results in less than independent viewpoints. As for the rest, they are not sitting Politicians however, the fact they associated and worked with Susan Moore a Casino backer remains of concern to me. People are judged by the company they keep in my opinion and that is a concern long term.
Ralph Hutchinson April 1, 2013 at 10:34 am
My bigger concern is how "beholden" many of our local Politicians are to Darius Anderson and his interests today. Their lack of independence and conflicts of interest are pathetic.
They attend his lavish private parties, serve on boards together, and benefit from his donations of Ramekins and other gifts. Over time this creates problems eroding independence and cronies can't say "NO" to each other. These same people used to be leaders in Rosewood Hillside Measure A, Cows Not Casinos, Hospital Measure C Leveroni Dairy Farm seizure, Staples or Peets. Yet today they seem complacent to Chateau Sonoma hotel on the plaza. In my opinion these are actions of a hypocrite. To benefit financially or emotionally from the guy behind "Cows Not Casinos" when many of them were formerly against demonstrates unclear policy and weak character in my opinion. Pay to Play is alive and well in Sonoma. I don't know if Darius learned these tactics from his SF Police Officer father if he came home and told his son what crap he saw in SF politicians, or learned it from Burkle, Bosco, or Gray Davis but Darius is smooth and has been working our City Council and District Supervisors for years now.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Sonoma Valley Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Ralph Hutchinson June 13, 2013 at 03:22 pm
Rumors are that the Chamber of Commerce, Grange, Vintners & Growers, Hotel Owners, RestaurantsRead More and many other small businesses are jumping on the Living Wage bandwagon started by Darius Anderson and his proposed 59 room hotel Project Sonoma formerly Chateau Sonoma. Darius partnered with Ben Boyce known local supporter and leader for Living Wage public policy to formulate a plan and press campaign for his hotel. They both rolled it out simultaneously in the Index Tribune and Sonoma Sun a few weeks ago. The Facebook page from Kenwood Investments now titled Sonoma Hotel Project linked the article and applauded Ben Boyce's literary efforts citing it as a great article. Its unclear what impact this move by Anderson may have on the Federated Indians of Graton Rancheria casino in Rohnert Park. Station Casinos the operating company and client of Darius Anderson from Las Vegas has a checkered past in dealing with organizing labor the various applicable unions. A simple Google search will reveal loads of negative press on Station Casinos and labor relationships as well as sanctions and complaints. Darius Anderson and his policy has the chance to make a major impact on casino wage policy. Afterall Darius is responsible for bringing us Cows Not Casinos to Sonoma Valley back in 2003. It is possible this wave of Living Wages policy could also spread wildly throughout the State with all of Darius Anderson's contacts as a lobbyists and consultant. At least to the various Station Casinos affiliated casinos. This strategic alliance of Anderson and Boyce on Living Wages could in fact make him a "poster child" or sorts and further the agenda throughout the County and beyond. Many are starting to formulate different opinions about Darius Anderson one not just of personal profiting off the backs of others, but in giving back to the working class and ensuring reasonable wages and benefits. This could boost his public image in Sonoma Valley. It remains to be seen if he can use his lobbying skills to turn the local business community into supporting Living Wages as they typically are dead set against. The local grape growers and wineries may also likely come around since they are all seemingly so closely ties to the hotel growth initiative then they must also be supporters of Living Wage efforts recently launched.
sal nero June 18, 2013 at 02:45 pm
OMG ! Could it really be true? Darius has a benevolent side? Unions and living wages and fairRead More treatment not just for hotel workers but everyone. Wineries, restaurants stores... This is such great news. Thank you very much !!!
Ralph Hutchinson June 18, 2013 at 03:17 pm
The grassroots understands the National Press has been alerted to Darius Anderson's stance on LivingRead More Wages with the Sonoma Hotel Project of Kenwood Investments and will be watching closely. This could become a National "feel good" story on one of the evening magazine programs before year-end. This move has really become a game changer in Sonoma. I still can't figure out how Darius got the Chamber of Commerce, and the conservatives to go along with his idea to sweeten the pot for his new hotel. Labor Costs could double for most Sonoma small businesses thanks to Darius Andersons personal powerplay. How in the world does he explain that to his constituent group?
Ralph Hutchinson June 18, 2013 at 10:00 am
Waste of time and City resources to think they can impact Federal policy. Why not focus on theRead More Living Wages wave started by this hotel debate. Council has a chance to see the entire city, hotel, tourism, restaurants, vineyard workers, and retail workforce get on board and turn the Chamber of Commerce position toward helping those in need, Sonoma's working class. Come on City Council, do whats right for Sonoma and focus on what you have the power to influence not on what makes you all look best politically or what pays back a favor to someone you owe.
sal nero June 13, 2013 at 07:50 am
Isn't it astounding that someone who purports to be a protector of the public's trust/news couldRead More nakedly shill for their own and their partner's profit? It was only 10 short years ago that The Lynchs had the Sons of the Golden West historically dedicate the Index-Tribune Building with a commemorative plaque. If they weren't to be believed back then why should we believe them now? On top of that, selling to someone who is a regular redeveloper is a very bad sign for Sonoma. On top of that, selling to the very one who's proposed Sonoma's Casino Bill Lynch described as "a nightmare" (4/23/03 I-T Op-Ed) is as hypocritical and cynical a move as can be imagined. There isn't enough shame to heap on them!
Ralph Hutchinson June 13, 2013 at 09:33 am
Crony newspaper used to serve Lynch and his cronies now just shifted over to serve Darius AndersonRead More interests and that circle of cronies. Just a mouthpiece to tout personal interests not cover any fair and balanced news. Whats funny is Bolling routinely screams how he is independent and publishes anything he wants not what Darius tells him to. Well Bolling...the general public see it differently and this is yet another example. Actions speak louder than words.
Chris Scott June 14, 2013 at 11:36 pm
Mr Nero ; In the IT letter to the editor (LTE) you refer to I showed Mr Kozel that in the fall ofRead More 2012 Ms Hainstock never wrote a letter supporting Valerie Brown's candidacy..Valerie Brown was not running for supervisor in 2012............................[ Link to the Mr Kozel's IT LTE: http://www.sonomanews.com/News-2013/No-hell-to-pay-for-no-disclosure/ ] which contains links to Ms Hainstock's LTE in the PD and IT (the same letter appeared in both papers.)..... .............. Ms Hainstock did write a letter supporting the candidacy of Mr. Sawyer who was running for Supervisor. ........................... Please let me know if you need any further assistance. Just post your contact info here and I'll get in contact. ........................Chris Scott .................................................................................................................. PS: The formatting is so screwed up because the editor does not recognize or insert page or paragraph breaks. I had a better text editor 25 years ago writing assembly code under UNIX. Them were 'da days!
Ralph Hutchinson June 12, 2013 at 02:00 pm
FROM HIS MPR WEBSITE: Most recently, he handled the controversial March 2007, Measure B campaign, aRead More parcel tax increase for the Sonoma Valley Health Care District that increases the funding for their local hospital over the next five years. There was mass confusion and controversy amongst voters as it relates to the hospital. The polling indicated that the highest watermark for Measure B was 59%. The campaign needed 67% to be successful. Measure B passed with 74% of the vote.
Ralph Hutchinson June 12, 2013 at 02:07 pm
Wasn't Ron Burkle, Darius Andersons old mentor from Ralph's Grocery Stores-Yucaipa? And Doesn'tRead More Darius host State Assemblymen from San Luis Obispo on junkets to Cuba and aren't these same Assemblymen from San Luis Obispo where another big Development Center a sister to Sonoma Development Center reside. Are we starting to see the same patterns of cronies popping up again? Any other names below on Darius Anderson's like of clients he lobbies for and also connected to Muelrath? From his MPR Website: His work for previous clients includes consulting for Waste Management, Ralphs Grocery Stores, Sprint PCS, and Chevron, directing public affairs/grassroots lobbying programs. He also assisted in crisis management for Mobil Oil Corporation. Mr. Muelrath attended California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo and studied Agricultural Science and Political Science.
sal nero June 12, 2013 at 05:43 pm
Burkle recently assisted Anderson in Sacramento to retain the NBA team before exiting, assuringRead More redevelopment of speculative property purchased by Anderson. They have worked on several developments including Treasure Island, which lost its Chinese financing partner only very recently. These guys do the same things over and over. Is it really a stretch to imagine a Casino locally? Just keep whispering to yourself "it can't happen here, can't It?" Hey Dorothy, you're not in Kansas anymore !!!
sal nero June 11, 2013 at 01:53 pm
Will he pay a living wage at the new CASINO in Eldridge formerly known as SDC? Will former residentsRead More be forced to scrub the floors? Reminds one of "David Copperfield."
Ralph Hutchinson June 11, 2013 at 01:55 pm
A groundswell is rumored on the wake of Darius Anderson's announcement that his new Project SonomaRead More Hotel would be paying Living Wages, a host of challenges and interest has been growing in the fact that this move may cause all the other Sonoma Valley hotels to pay Living Wages. But it hasn't stopped there, the local restaurants, the Chamber of Commerce, the Rotary Club, The Vintners and Growers Association, even the Rohnert Park Casino has been rumored to be considering Living Wages and/or Organizing Labor. Darius Anderson may well have started a push that could put Sonoma County on he map for progressive liberal wage policy and become a model for the rest of America.
Ralph Hutchinson June 11, 2013 at 02:03 pm
Is Darius Anderson planning on developing the Sonoma Development Center? Didn't Dave Bolling sayRead More his boss was interested? Where will all the innocent residents go if the SDC is closed? All that for a casino, hotel, and some retail stores? Can Arnold Drive even handle that? Hey, where are the SAVE ARNOLD DRIVE people let's awaken that sleeping giant and see if Darius still wants to try to develop SDC huh? You know Darius just doesn't do his homework research when trying things in Sonoma Valley does he?
sal nero June 17, 2013 at 08:46 am
No we are just experts on the "INTERNETS."
Chris Scott June 18, 2013 at 10:41 am
Mr. Hutchinson; Patience is a virtue. One should always practice virtues. We viewed your post atRead More the time of this writing. Presented with an opportunity today.
Chris Scott June 18, 2013 at 01:18 pm
Mr Hutchinson; How many comments of yours and mine are you going to delete or have deleted today?
Ralph Hutchinson June 7, 2013 at 03:15 pm
Will the casino in Rohnert Park also get looped in with Living Wages and full Union Shop status? IsRead More Ben Boyce working on that project now? Perhaps the new relationship forged on the Hotel Index Tribune with Boyce, can lead to Darius introducing him to the Station Casino people so Ben can discuss the benefits to the Las Vegas casino people? Perhaps Ben can also introduce the various Unions to the applicable parts of the casino operation as well? Gee this relationship just may change the way the entire Northbay Labor Relationships will go?
Will Shonbrun June 8, 2013 at 10:13 am
I applaud and encourage all Sonoma hotels to pay All their employees a living wage. I trust thatRead More Kenwood Investments will pay a living wage in whatever enterprises they now own or will own. And most importantly we can now expect all Sonoma hotels, vintners and growers to do likewise. Kudos to these good business folks for finally seeing the light and embracing just wages. Just think of the great public relations this progressive step will have on future tourism: Sonoma acts to defeat poverty! Does it get any better than this? Chamber of Commerce, are you now aboard?
Ralph Hutchinson June 11, 2013 at 01:36 pm
Maybe the Grange will also get onboard with Living Wages after whipping up the oyster debate into aRead More froth? Yannick?.....any interest in a little grassroots movement to make a real difference here in Sonoma Valley instead of the oyster farms in Marin? The Chamber of Commerce, the Rotary, The Grange, the Vintners and Growers Association....just imagine the movement that Darius Anderson principal of Kenwood Investments developer for the infamous Chateau Sonoma French style Hotel now a Jack London theme so we hear. Lets march on to the Rohnert park Casino and organize their Unions as well for Station Casino, Darius Anderson's consulting client who has a very poor relationship with organized labor in Las Vegas. A change to right the wrongs...time will tell.
sal nero June 7, 2013 at 08:59 am
"Protect Sonoma" is a political action committee paid for by the currently proposed 59Read More room hotel's chief partner, Darius Anderson. It must not be forgotten that 10 years ago he attempted, against Sonoma's wishes, to shove an Indian Casino down our throats. Its fair to ask why his prospective competitors would now back him. They had to be promised something, right? What was it? Could it be they were promised higher year 'round room occupancy by way of a nearby CASINO? Since he won't apologize or even acknowledge his role in that endeavor 10 years ago suspicions are appropriate. Otherwise why wouldn't he publicly reassure Sonoma that another CASINO attempt isn't in the wings in an effort to sweeten the pot and gain support for his oversized Plaza hotel proposal, right? Shouldn't trust be earned?
Ralph Hutchinson June 7, 2013 at 11:03 am
Last year the hotels begged for promotion dollars, this year they want to dilute the market byRead More flooding new inventory. For some reason this seems hypocritical and poor policy. There must be some other promises on the table because it doesn't seem realistic to support overbuilding into an already soft market. Is there some referral game going on? Some promise of Hollywood packing the streets of Sonomawood? Something is just odd here.
Chris Scott June 7, 2013 at 10:20 pm
Mr Nero, Mr Hutchinson; Thanks. Did not notice the scroll bar on the right. That’s aRead More beginning of the committee’s disclosure. Still need the balance; the same as for any initiative. You’ve seen this as shown for any voter’s handbook and on any initiative’s web site. Also committee members comments/posts signature includes “Member of (or affiliated with) PSC.” Transparency. Chris Scott
Chris Scott June 8, 2013 at 06:37 am
thank you, your prayers worked. Chris Scott
Ralph Hutchinson June 9, 2013 at 10:32 pm
What the heck are you talking about Chris?