.
Feedback

Sonoma Developmental Center is 'Cadillac of Care,' Parents' Representative Says

Kathleen Miller says families of Sonoma's clients want to keep their loved ones there in spite of reports of assaults.

In the wake of reports of abuse and inadequate investigation at Sonoma Developmental Center and other state-run homes for the developmentally disabled, the head of a parents' advocacy group is giving the public another perspective.

Kathleen Miller is president of Parent Hospital Association, a group that represents people who have loved ones at the Sonoma center, in the community of Eldridge. The center is the largest of four such residential care complexes in California. In the past few years, it has come under fire for reports of and Tasering.

Recently, the state Department of Developmental Services, which operates the centers, volunteered to withdraw four units at the Sonoma location from federal certification for Medicaid and Medicare, acknowledging problems there.

The state threatened to shut the facility down, after Sonoma lost its primary license.

California Watch, part of the Center for Investigative Reporting, has published a series of articles on the state-run facilities and recently presented a public forum in Sonoma on the issues. Miller was one of the people on the panel. She also spoke at a Sonoma City Council meeting recently, to educate the public about the issues from a parent's perspective.

According to Miller, Sonoma Developmental Center is the "Cadillac of care" for its clients. She speaks from the experience of four decades of seeing her son Dan going in and out of developmental centers and privately run community homes. She told Patch that the public needs to understand that the type of abuse reported at the Sonoma facility also happens in community homes. Clients can be evicted from the homes for their behavior, she said. If the developmental centers close, there will be no other place for evicted clients to go.

"Society is not always kind to the developmentally disabled," she said.

Miller does not discount the reports of abuse at the Sonoma center.

But she said, "These are complex issues. We need to right this ship and correct the problems before we consider closing the developmental center. We families are told that the only reason we don't want Sonoma to close is because we don't know what's out there in the way of community homes. But it's the exact opposite: we don't want Sonoma to close because we do know what's out there."

Miller said the medical care at the Sonoma center is "second to none." She said staff are professional and the culture is "enchanting," with its many enrichment activities.

Her son Dan has lived at Sonoma Developmental Center for several years. He is now 45.

Miller learned Dan was autistic by the time he was 4. In puberty, he was diagnosed with Bipolar Disorder. He also has obsessive-compulsive behavior. She raised Dan at home until he went into puberty, when his behavior became unmanageable and she needed to work outside the home, as a divorced parent. Over the years, Dan has lived in three developmental centers and two privately operated community homes.

Talking about the trauma of her son's experience in one of the community homes still makes Miller tearful.

"I am just now able to talk about it without crying," she told Patch on Monday at her home in Sonoma County.

In her living room, there's a framed photo of her with Dan, a tall, good-looking man, with wavy hair.

"He's a handsome guy," Miller said, "though these days it's more apparent that he has mental illness."

In his youth, he loved to climb a tree in Miller's back yard. Now he is afraid of physical activities.

"He talks to himself and I have to work sometimes to bring him out of that—to engage him," she said. "I miss his younger self."

"He first became mentally ill in his community home," she said.

Miller had hoped he would only be there temporarily and that she could take him back to live at home.

"They kicked him out," she said. "The regional center gave him back to my care. He was very ill and I recall the only way I could manage him was to take him on long, long walks. I took a leave from work. One night I got a relief babysitter so my daughter and I could get a break. She ended up calling the police—she could not handle him. He was placed in Agnews (Developmental Center). We had him moved to Camarillo (Developmental Center) so we could visit him. When Camarillo closed, we tried the community again."

What followed was devastating for both Miller and her son, she told Patch. Dan's behavior deteriorated, so the doctor took him off his medications cold turkey.

"Dan ended up in diapers, not speaking," she said. "They put him on Thorazine (an anti-psychotic drug). At one point, the staff and I couldn't wake him up."

Miller said the son she placed in that home is no longer the son she knows today.

"He never really recovered," she said.

"He eventually went to Fairview (Developmental Center) but we had him moved up here when we moved here," she said.

Miller visits Dan at least once a week at Sonoma Developmental Center. She believes he is in the right place, where he can get the best care. She said other families feel the same way about their loved ones and they don't want the center to close because they know the community homes are no better. She said she has found that staff in some homes are not adequately trained.

"We don't know how the cases of abuse in those homes are being reported," she said, in reference to the series of stories on the developmental centers. She said she knows of serious cases in community homes that have received very little or no news coverage, compared to the recent spotlight on the centers.

********

TELL US: If you are a family member of a client at Sonoma, perhaps you'd like to also offer your opinions in our comments section below.

Follow Sonoma Valley Patch on Facebook and Twitter.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Sonoma Valley Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Ralph Hutchinson May 18, 2013 at 08:51 pm
I still say the People will be wise to these bush league tactics and the residents of Sonoma willRead More vote against the destruction of the Plaza and our small town feel. We won''t sell out like Napa or Healdsburg and certainly we're not like the 101 corridor.
Ralph Hutchinson May 17, 2013 at 09:38 am
Another Cuban party perhaps in the works at the Kenwood Ranch, chompin on contraband cigars, etc?Read More Grand prize trips to Cuba with Californians Building Bridges and rub elbows with fatcat Politicians? Or maybe Kings tickets?
Ralph Hutchinson May 17, 2013 at 11:37 am
What kind of conflicts of interest are present with Nancy Simpson? She is on the County Landmarks,Read More formerly affiliated with Sonoma Valley Visitors Bureau and Wendy Peterson? Are all these agencies and bureaus interlocked some receiving TOT tax revenues, and all standing to benefit from anything Darius Anderson can build?
Ralph Hutchinson May 17, 2013 at 11:32 am
Is Darius really after a casino in Sonoma either at General Vallejo State Park next to his RamekinsRead More location or up valley at Sonoma Development Center?
Ralph Hutchinson May 17, 2013 at 11:31 am
Ms. G doesn't even live in Sonoma does she? Isn't it Cloverdale? Wasn't she a big proponent of theRead More bypass in her town?
sal nero May 15, 2013 at 08:11 pm
The Sonoma Sun's website (but not SunFMTV) has been down for hours. What's happening ?
Ralph Hutchinson May 15, 2013 at 03:25 pm
Did Darius Anderso agree to buyout The Patch and have the archives and comments removed as part ofRead More this new software update? Afterall "Cows Not Casinos", Measure A Rosewood Hillside hotel, and Measure C Hospital Eminent Domain would be better if the People of Sonoma forgot all about it and let his hotel venture fly easier.
sal nero May 15, 2013 at 03:20 pm
When Bolling "lost" his comments on Sonoma Valley Bank and then the whole archive heRead More blamed a glitch yet they have never been restored. That has benefitted the Hotel Index-Tribune and allowed a cover up of key historical dates and facts. Please hurry and restore the Patch's missing blogs and comments ASAP so that the confidence the Sonoma Patch has attained is not damaged. Thanks
Ralph Hutchinson May 15, 2013 at 03:09 pm
The comments to various articles and blogs are also completely missing. Please restore asap.
Dee Baucher May 18, 2013 at 09:37 am
I write about the issue of the BRACA test, because I am someone who developed breast cancer, and whoRead More needed the test. Even though I already had breast cancer, the decision of whether to have a bilateral mastectomy (rather than just a removal of the cancer with a "lumpectomy" or the removal of only one, effected, breast) was dependent upon the results of that test. If I had a genetic marker that indicated I was likely to develop more breast cancers, there would be no reason to avoid having both breasts removed at once. Even though my doctors recognized the importance of getting this test done before surgical decisions were made, the insurance company was resistant to providing coverage for the test. There were many heated phone conversations with the insurance company, and many letters of documentation before I was finally allowed to have the test. The basic test for BRAC I and BRAC II (the 2 main genes identified) cost $3,000. However, there are even more specialized tests for the smaller BRAC genes (rare genes that are less common) that cost thousands of dollars extra, and would have been helpful because of my family history. I was not able to fight with the insurance company for permission to obtain those extra tests, since I was already weak and ill from the chemotherapy, at that time. It is not reasonable or acceptable for women to have to fight to get necessary tests performed, because of excessive charging for those tests, and resistance of the medical insurance companies to provide coverage to obtain them. This situation needs to be changed. I hope that Angelina Jolie's story will bring attention to this issue, and will help our Supreme Court to recognize the unfairness in allowing a company to lay claim on a "patent" of our genes. The main research to provide the exact mapping of our genes was provided by the "Human Genome Project", which was primarily paid for by the US taxpayers, via that extensive NIH study. The Myriad company did some further research to refine knowledge on the BRACA genes; but they should not be allowed a total patent which blocks all other US labs from performing tests on that same part of our DNA. That is unreasonable in terms of the amount of profit they are claiming, and unfair to US humans who should be able to claim ownership of their own DNA.
Dee Baucher May 18, 2013 at 08:50 am
I am not used to Hollywood-types having the type of integrity and honesty, that Ms. Jolie displayedRead More with her NY Times revelation. I commend her for having the courage to act proactively with surgical removal of her breasts, in addition to the planned removal of her ovaries. She lost her beloved mother to the disease, and she clearly understands the devastation that would befall her own children (if she were to develop the types of cancers that her genetic makeup render her vulnerable to). I agree with her decision, and hope that I would have the same strength, if confronted with the genetic evidence that she was able to have documented with the BRACA testing. Unfortunately, many women who would benefit in the same way, from advance knowledge about their genetic vulnerability to those cancers, are denied the ability to get the tests. The company that "owns" the test, by virtue of their assertion that they "own the patent" on that identified portion of our DNA, charge $3,000.00 for the test. That cost is too high for most women in the US to easily afford, and our health insurance typically refuses to cover the test for most women. There is currently a case before the US Supreme Court challenging the idea of a medical company owning our genes. Many of us are hopeful that the court will halt this company from claiming this patent, so that laboratories all over the country can provide the test to us inexpensively, and therefore it will be available to all who should have it. The costs for the type of very sophisticated plastic surgery/ breast reconstruction that Ms. Jolie underwent, are also extremely high. It is doubtful that insurance or Obamacare will provide coverage for that type of costly prophylactic surgery. Those are battles that women will need to fight in the future, when more women become informed about their personal risks and choices.